IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: opstat model questions

Elliot Schwartz <elliot@ghost.uunet.ca> Mon, 01 May 1995 20:32 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10294; 1 May 95 16:32 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10288; 1 May 95 16:32 EDT
Received: from wugate.wustl.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15878; 1 May 95 16:32 EDT
Received: from host (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wugate.wustl.edu (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id PAA29486; Mon, 1 May 1995 15:32:02 -0500
Received: from ghost.uunet.ca (ghost.uunet.ca [142.77.1.100]) by wugate.wustl.edu (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id PAA29395 for <oswg-l@wugate.wustl.edu>; Mon, 1 May 1995 15:30:31 -0500
Received: from localhost by ghost.uunet.ca with SMTP id <52882-1>; Mon, 1 May 1995 16:30:22 -0400
Message-Id: <95May1.163022edt.52882-1@ghost.uunet.ca>
Date: Mon, 01 May 1995 16:30:20 -0400
Reply-To: oswg-l@wugate.wustl.edu
X-Orig-Sender: owner-oswg-l@wugate.wustl.edu
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Elliot Schwartz <elliot@ghost.uunet.ca>
To: oswg-l@wugate.wustl.edu
Subject: Re: opstat model questions
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 01 May 95 16:06:14 EDT." <199505012007.PAA28024@wugate.wustl.edu>
X-Sender: elliot@ghost.uunet.ca
X-Listprocessor-Version: 7.1 -- ListProcessor by CREN

>In such a reconfiguration, would the network address also change?

I don't see why it matters, since there's no mention of IP addresses
in either draft. (the labels used are network names, router names, and
link names)

But anyway, the answer could be yes or no. An organization might be
renumbering in someway, but keeping their network topology the same. In
this case it would make sense for the link names to remain the same.
The change might also be rearranging or adding cards to a router,
which wouldn't affect the IP addresses, but may change the
interface numbers that are associated with particular links.

elliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email