opstat model questions
Jeff Yarnell <jeffya@teleport.com> Wed, 26 April 1995 18:32 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09001; 26 Apr 95 14:32 EDT
Received: from [132.151.1.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08997; 26 Apr 95 14:32 EDT
Received: from wugate.wustl.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11674; 26 Apr 95 14:32 EDT
Received: from host (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wugate.wustl.edu (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id NAA28576; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 13:32:11 -0500
Received: from desiree.teleport.com (desiree.teleport.com [192.108.254.11]) by wugate.wustl.edu (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id NAA28221 for <oswg-l@mail.wustl.edu>; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 13:26:26 -0500
Received: from yarnell (ip-pdx6-08.teleport.com [204.119.60.168]) by desiree.teleport.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA09792 for <oswg-l@mail.wustl.edu>; Wed, 26 Apr 1995 11:26:16 -0700
Message-Id: <199504261826.LAA09792@desiree.teleport.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 1995 11:27:40 -0700
Reply-To: oswg-l@wugate.wustl.edu
X-Orig-Sender: owner-oswg-l@wugate.wustl.edu
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jeff Yarnell <jeffya@teleport.com>
To: oswg-l@wugate.wustl.edu
Subject: opstat model questions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Sender: jeffya@mail.teleport.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
X-Listprocessor-Version: 7.1 -- ListProcessor by CREN
As a newcomer to the opstat working group I have several questions. I have read the drafts associated with the group and like very much what is being done. 1. The Model for Common Operational Statistics draft mentions the Internet Standard MIB several times. Does this term refer to MIB-II or the collection of all standard MIBs? 2. The discussion of metrics seems to be biased towards obtaining data from MIB-II, and particularly from routers. I have a couple years of experience with RMON, and it seems like a natural supplier of network metrics data. Has this, or other standard MIBs been considered? 3. The storage format described again seems to show a bias towards routers. Is there any reason that the "router-name" field couldn't be something more abstract like host or device since other hosts on the network may supply network metrics? 4. Can someone clarify the "link-name" in the storage format? Thanks for your assistance, Jeff Yarnell Kaspia Systems, Inc.
- opstat model questions Jeff Yarnell
- Re: opstat model questions Alex Bochannek
- Re: opstat model questions Henry Clark
- Re: opstat model questions J Nevil Brownlee
- Re: opstat model questions Gerald Winters
- Re: opstat model questions Alex Bochannek
- Re: opstat model questions elliot
- Re: opstat model questions Gerald Winters
- Re: opstat model questions Elliot Schwartz
- Re: opstat model questions Alex Bochannek
- Re: opstat model questions elliot
- Re: opstat model questions Alex Bochannek
- Re: opstat model questions Elliot Schwartz
- Re: opstat model questions Henry Clark