Re: California wimps need not apply
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 15 December 1994 23:55 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09977; 15 Dec 94 18:55 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09973; 15 Dec 94 18:55 EST
Received: from merit.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20398; 15 Dec 94 18:55 EST
Received: from nacho.cisco.com (nacho.cisco.com [171.69.3.141]) by merit.edu (8.6.9/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id SAA22472 for <ietf-ppp@merit.edu>; Thu, 15 Dec 1994 18:37:32 -0500
Received: from [171.69.60.202] (fbaker-mac.cisco.com [171.69.60.202]) by nacho.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/CISCO.SERVER.1.1) with SMTP id PAA24054; Thu, 15 Dec 1994 15:35:17 -0800
X-Sender: fred@nacho.cisco.com
Message-Id: <ab16823c0e021003e35d@[171.69.60.202]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1994 15:35:20 -0800
To: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: California wimps need not apply
Cc: Tom Coradetti <tomc@digibd.com>, ietf-ppp@merit.edu
At 12:46 PM 12/15/94, Brian Lloyd wrote:
>Warning to the humor impaired: this reply message is sent in jest, i.e. is
>*not*, I repeat, *not* serious. It contains no information of any
>substance. Therefore, it clearly ... qualifies to be on the IETF
>standards track.
Is *that* the criterion? I have been trying to figure out the criterion for
some time now...
>It's cold here in California too. I had to wear a sweater yesterday!
I've been spending far too much time in San Jose. I was going to bring my
winter jacket, but my wife told me I needed something with long sleeves. So
I brought a poncho.
=============================================================================
If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room!
- Re: California wimps need not apply Fred Baker
- Re: California wimps need not apply Brian Lloyd
- Re: California wimps need not apply Fred Baker