EDB Time stamps
Skip Slone <jpslone@tag.den.mmc.com> Wed, 02 December 1992 20:25 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18549; 2 Dec 92 15:25 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18545; 2 Dec 92 15:25 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23048; 2 Dec 92 15:26 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.03199-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 2 Dec 1992 18:46:16 +0000
Received: from everest.den.mmc.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.29805-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 2 Dec 1992 18:45:59 +0000
Received: from tag (tag.den.mmc.com) by everest.den.mmc.com (4.1/1.34.a) id AA01300; Wed, 2 Dec 92 11:44:58 MST
Received: by tag (4.1/1.34.a) id AA19750; Wed, 2 Dec 92 11:46:22 MST
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1992 11:46:22 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Skip Slone <jpslone@tag.den.mmc.com>
Message-Id: <9212021846.AA19750@tag>
To: BIEWESCH@restena.lu
Subject: EDB Time stamps
Cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, quipu@cs.ucl.ac.uk
> > b) Will the updates still be performed or will they simply be stopped after > sylvester 1999, as 00 is less than 99 (or how is this comparaison made)? > Romain, I can't answer any of the questions having to do with the reasons for Quipu being designed as it is, but the way I understand it, the change from 99 to 00 won't be a problem since it only checks for equality. If the date/time stamp is different, the master EDB is assumed to be the correct one. -- Skip Slone
- EDB Time stamps Skip Slone