Re: United Nations
Paul Rarey <Paul.Rarey@systems.dhl.com> Sat, 19 November 1994 00:47 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12307; 18 Nov 94 19:47 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12303; 18 Nov 94 19:47 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19736; 18 Nov 94 19:47 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.13079-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Sat, 19 Nov 1994 00:07:42 +0000
Received: from gateway1.DHL.COM by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.06437-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Sat, 19 Nov 1994 00:06:47 +0000
Received: from hpport.systems.DHL.COM by gateway1.DHL.COM id aa19354; 18 Nov 94 17:03 PST
Received: from cowboy.systems.DHL.COM by hpport.systems.DHL.COM with ESMTP (DHLGMS 5.00/DSI) id AA07919; Fri, 18 Nov 1994 16:06:35 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Rarey <Paul.Rarey@systems.dhl.com>
Message-Id: <9411181607.ZM19191@cowboy.systems.DHL.COM>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 1994 16:07:46 -0800
In-Reply-To: brw@hookup.net (Brian R. Williams) "Re: United Nations" (Nov 18, 15:03)
References: <199411182303.SAA26127@nic.ott.hookup.net>
Reply-To: Paul Rarey <Paul.Rarey@systems.dhl.com>
X-Mailer: ZM-Win (3.2.1 09Sep94)
To: "Brian R. Williams" <brw@hookup.net>, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, quipu@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: United Nations
Cc: "Ella P. Gardner" <epg@gateway.mitre.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
The notion of C=WW has been kicked around for sometime. I first heard discussions on this in the US-NMTS meetings two(?) years ago. There are providers who quietly (mostly) like to see this happen also. Ella Gardner at Mitre raised this issue also sometime back. I believe it was for the UN, but it might have been the World Health Organization. Comments Ella? On Nov 18, 15:03, Brian R. Williams wrote: > Subject: Re: United Nations }At 8:11 AM 94/11/18 -0800, Russ Wright wrote: }>>Date: Wed, 16 Nov 1994 18:18:17 -0500 (EST) }>>From: Malcolm Chapman <malcolm@nygate.undp.org> } }..stuff deleted }>> }>>We are in the process of establishing X.500 services for the different }>>agencies that comprise the United Nations System. Due to the international }>>nature of the organization, we are faced with the problem of the 'Country'. }>> } }I'll be interested in some of the responses to this. I have wondered how }the authors of the standard would suggest I place an entry for an }ambassador (or other diplomatic/military staff) in a foreign country -- }Somewhere in the foreign country's DIT or in his/her home country's DIT. I }probably wouldn't have access to the former (to manage the entry), but }using the latter brings other minor }issues. If someone in Washington was looking for the Canadian ambasador to }the U.S., where would that person *naturally* look? Under U.S. or Canada. }What if that was the British ambassador to the UN (with offices and }residence in New York)-- would one look under UK, US, or UN. My thought }would be to have an entry in the home country directory, requesting aliases }in the others, but I'd like to hear other suggestions. } }The entry postal address would probably have to contain a country name, which }would probably be different than the country name defined in the }Distinguished Name. I expect one wouldn't normally include a country name }in a postal address of a traditional entry where said country is also the }country defined in the DN. } }Comments? } }Regards, } }Brian } >-- End of excerpt from Brian R. Williams -- Cheers! [ psr ]
- Re: United Nations Russ Wright
- Re: United Nations Brian R. Williams
- Re: United Nations Paul Rarey
- Re[2]: United Nations D.W.Chadwick