Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and Higher Mobility

Acee,

Can you answer my questions below?

Thanks,
Richard

> In the simulations for Smart Peering, what neighbors were included in
> the router-LSAs?  If only adjacent neighbors were included,
> then that could explain the lower overhead obtained for Smart Peering,
> and would also result in highly suboptimal paths
> (much longer than shortest paths).  That is why simulation
> results are not very meaningful unless other measures such
> as average path length and delivery ratio are also presented.
> (The average path length can be obtained from the numbers of UDP
> packets sent/forwarded/received, but I did not see those numbers.)
>
> Also, since Cisco is running SPF twice, once for real adjacencies
> and once for all acceptable links, I would like to know how
> a router knows which non-local links are real adjacencies.
> Does the LSA somehow indicate this?  Is a different Link State ID
> used for real adjacenies versus non-adjacencies? 

_______________________________________________
Ospf-wireless-design mailing list
Ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design