[OSPF] FW: I-D Action: draft-dong-ospf-maxage-flush-problem-statement-01.txt
"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Wed, 02 November 2016 07:53 UTC
Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FE7129A2B for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 00:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.718
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.718 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AQ5jb-iqmuVl for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 00:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F20F129490 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 00:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CZN37633; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 07:53:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:52:46 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:52:31 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-dong-ospf-maxage-flush-problem-statement-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSM1RIXoZVZmJvu0SIh+5wOoqsiKDFUzPA
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 07:52:31 +0000
Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92793504712@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <147790398740.32385.5565239136336623420.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <147790398740.32385.5565239136336623420.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.151.75]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090205.58199B79.000D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 296f8f770d0156306f1e9ce68c41efda
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/-WbDmYaK5SxCgmhDyNfNhxTahrg>
Cc: "Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP)" <zhangxudong@huawei.com>, "李振强 (lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com)" <lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com>
Subject: [OSPF] FW: I-D Action: draft-dong-ospf-maxage-flush-problem-statement-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 07:53:34 -0000
Dear all, We have submitted a new version of draft-dong-ospf-maxage-flush-problem-statement. This draft analyzed the scenarios of MaxAge LSA flushing, and the impact of flushing storm to the network and services. Comments are welcome. Best regards, Jie -----Original Message----- From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 4:53 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-dong-ospf-maxage-flush-problem-statement-01.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : OSPF LSA Flushing Problem Statement Authors : Jie Dong Xudong Zhang Zhenqiang Li Filename : draft-dong-ospf-maxage-flush-problem-statement-01.txt Pages : 6 Date : 2016-10-31 Abstract: In OSPF protocol, Link State Advertisements (LSAs) are exchanged in Link State Update (LSU) packets to achieve link state database (LSDB) synchronization and consistent route calculation. OSPF protocol specifies several scenarios in which an LSA is flushed with the LS age field set to MaxAge. In some cases, the flushing of MaxAge LSAs may cause flooding storm of OSPF packets and severely impact the services provided by the network. This document describes the problem of OSPF LSA flushing, and ask for solutions to solve this problem. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-ospf-maxage-flush-problem-statement/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dong-ospf-maxage-flush-problem-statement-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dong-ospf-maxage-flush-problem-statement-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [OSPF] FW: I-D Action: draft-dong-ospf-maxage-flu… Dongjie (Jimmy)