IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OSPF] FW: I-D Action: draft-dong-ospf-flush-mitigation-00.txt

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Wed, 02 November 2016 07:59 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929AF129471 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 00:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.718
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.718 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K4egoesatkFt for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 00:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B26129453 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 00:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CUJ10763; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 07:58:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:58:58 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:58:45 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-dong-ospf-flush-mitigation-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSM2H1yZX5kkOKFE6Er0omg/c7BKDFVd/g
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 07:58:45 +0000
Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92793504748@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <147790766270.32381.6295367347402293458.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <147790766270.32381.6295367347402293458.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.151.75]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090202.58199CC3.0041, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 8bc3be5b93714d81146ef377ee09a8e1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/wB5ajsdYR5IJ2ELsbzK0m4c8Ndk>
Cc: "Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP)" <zhangxudong@huawei.com>, "李振强 (lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com)" <lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com>
Subject: [OSPF] FW: I-D Action: draft-dong-ospf-flush-mitigation-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 07:59:03 -0000

Dear all, 

We have submitted a new draft draft-dong-ospf-flush-mitigation, which aims to mitigate the problem described in draft-dong-ospf-maxage-flush-problem-statement-01. 

Comments are welcome.

Best regards,
Jie

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 5:54 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-dong-ospf-flush-mitigation-00.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.


        Title           : LSA Flushing Problem Mitigation in OSPF Networks
        Authors         : Jie Dong
                          Xudong Zhang
                          Zhenqiang Li
	Filename        : draft-dong-ospf-flush-mitigation-00.txt
	Pages           : 6
	Date            : 2016-10-31

Abstract:
   In OSPF protocol, LSAs with the LS age at MaxAge are not used in
   routing table calculation and MUST be flushed in the network.  In
   some cases, the flushing of OSPF MaxAge LSAs may cause flooding storm
   of OSPF packets and severely impact network stability and the
   services provided by the network.  This document specifies a backward
   compatible mechanism to mitigate the impact of MaxAge LSA flushing in
   OSPF networks.



The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-ospf-flush-mitigation/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dong-ospf-flush-mitigation-00


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email