IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6987 (4685)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 06 May 2016 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4E812D846 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2016 18:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZwBMNY5FXu0Y for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2016 18:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1FCE12D840 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 May 2016 18:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2804; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1462498821; x=1463708421; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=iSLgBtGbtn9OPbfW7uX2N5Bk4zrpameajRP9ZjrZOBI=; b=GY8ElDtfourpa2mVU5Gf76QFoGi9yY95ISxe77SCyFPeX16/AnoFVOCz TEmBLITEvrPfeK9hbwGLo3Z3YsElc61cJYNI+xKBoDTLuWBJ6f0lgSt0h B4V3FfF8hqJPv117xVk9ZlsTYJrnKU8p1sC1+eAq8w9KCs/LZa7l2evfA 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BBAgDY9CtX/4QNJK1EGoM4U30GrT2LYQENgXYihW4CHIEZOBQBAQEBAQEBZSeEQgEBBCMRRRACAQgaAiYCAgIfERUQAgQBDQWIFQMSDiytJ4w4DYQ5AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFXyJcIE5gQqBfIMAglkFh3kKhwiIXjEBjCCBeIFohE2IXodTh2ABHgEBQoIFDQ6BS2wBE4cafwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,584,1454976000"; d="scan'208";a="269517794"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 May 2016 01:40:20 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u461eKao029847 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 May 2016 01:40:20 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 5 May 2016 21:40:19 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 5 May 2016 21:40:19 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "Liem Nguyen (lhnguyen)" <lhnguyen@cisco.com>, "alex.zinin@gmail.com" <alex.zinin@gmail.com>, "Russ.White@vce.com" <Russ.White@vce.com>, "dmcpherson@verisign.com" <dmcpherson@verisign.com>, "akatlas@gmail.com" <akatlas@gmail.com>, "db3546@att.com" <db3546@att.com>, "Abhay Roy (akr)" <akr@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6987 (4685)
Thread-Index: AQHRpyy7sXWdtAlpg0CzQKa04LilsJ+rIiKA
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 01:40:19 +0000
Message-ID: <D3516B9E.5FFDD%acee@cisco.com>
References: <20160506001711.5545D180003@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160506001711.5545D180003@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <29700D0B90CA3048829886AAA945D537@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/0aYhy_hKAyLKM68T5nBfxj-7Eu4>
Cc: "alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com" <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6987 (4685)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 01:40:24 -0000

The text below is technically correct (other than the grammar). However,
I’d view it more as additional information than an actual errata.

Thanks,
Acee

On 5/5/16, 8:17 PM, "RFC Errata System" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

>The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6987,
>"OSPF Stub Router Advertisement".
>
>--------------------------------------
>You may review the report below and at:
>http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6987&eid=4685
>
>--------------------------------------
>Type: Technical
>Reported by: Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com>
>
>Section: 4
>
>Original Text
>-------------
>
>
>Corrected Text
>--------------
>(At the end of the section)
>
>If the stub router is located in transit area, crossed by virtual
>link(s), latter will become inoperational in case the stub router is
>on path between two virtual link endpoints - either due to only path
>in transit area or due to topology changes which move stub router onto
>this path. 
>
>Notes
>-----
>Virtual links become inoperational in case path metric between two
>endpoints is > 0xffff. Path metric of two or more links, one of which has
>MaxLinkMetric, will inevitably exceed value 0xffff.
>
>Instructions:
>-------------
>This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
>--------------------------------------
>RFC6987 (draft-ietf-ospf-rfc3137bis-04)
>--------------------------------------
>Title               : OSPF Stub Router Advertisement
>Publication Date    : September 2013
>Author(s)           : A. Retana, L. Nguyen, A. Zinin, R. White, D.
>McPherson
>Category            : INFORMATIONAL
>Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
>Area                : Routing
>Stream              : IETF
>Verifying Party     : IESG
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email