[OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6987 (4685)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 06 May 2016 00:17 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E33912D118 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2016 17:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1WPEoBL6qK3p for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2016 17:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AAC112D0A3 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 May 2016 17:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5545D180003; Thu, 5 May 2016 17:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: aretana@cisco.com, lhnguyen@cisco.com, alex.zinin@gmail.com, Russ.White@vce.com, dmcpherson@verisign.com, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana@cisco.com, akr@cisco.com, acee@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160506001711.5545D180003@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 17:17:11 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/1Y25AZqZLiKBLXXJB5Rsb2sdPc8>
Cc: alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com, ospf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6987 (4685)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 00:17:51 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6987,
"OSPF Stub Router Advertisement".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Technical
Reported by: Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com>

Section: 4

Original Text

Corrected Text
(At the end of the section)

If the stub router is located in transit area, crossed by virtual
link(s), latter will become inoperational in case the stub router is
on path between two virtual link endpoints - either due to only path
in transit area or due to topology changes which move stub router onto
this path. 

Virtual links become inoperational in case path metric between two endpoints is > 0xffff. Path metric of two or more links, one of which has MaxLinkMetric, will inevitably exceed value 0xffff.

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC6987 (draft-ietf-ospf-rfc3137bis-04)
Title               : OSPF Stub Router Advertisement
Publication Date    : September 2013
Author(s)           : A. Retana, L. Nguyen, A. Zinin, R. White, D. McPherson
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG