IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] WG Last Call for "Signalling ELC using OSPF"

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sat, 05 November 2016 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8916D129567; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 09:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.017
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IJefonXgWlKr; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 09:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 185F9129549; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 09:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5971; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1478364590; x=1479574190; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=chBGAAvfLBdFdrOE2NX7Y8qONAWCCwC4KUAk4rgKiX0=; b=Xdy5XMUYmaVm+SlKfxQqJddv4q4a5dNUoQ6lp52Cpztj8itYkoKsS6sI mltEyTZnSHuD9ymFvrd+3e5xFqJQzCspYxsRUg+NfHFnrLkmups9eJBkz R/piC3TbwKBx0qNIhZwgpihwWRKk01R1kKhOIIdj4bsrvqfb/soU9X5XY g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BwAQC3DB5Y/5RdJa1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgnM7AQEBAQEfWHwHjTGXAY84gwuCD4IIKYV7AhqBbT8UAQIBAQEBAQEBYh0LhGEBAQEEHQZWEAIBCAQNAwECKAMCAgIwFAkIAgQOBYhYDrAGgkCLSAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARcFixOEZ4JkglwFmicBkEOBboRwiAmBKY0qhAUBHjd6G4UPcgGGN4EMAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,597,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="167784988"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Nov 2016 16:49:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA5Gnm3e025696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 5 Nov 2016 16:49:49 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:49:48 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:49:48 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] WG Last Call for "Signalling ELC using OSPF"
Thread-Index: AQHSN4SeJWAmu2AF1UC7sAJ1i2UHxQ==
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2016 16:49:48 +0000
Message-ID: <D443852B.8827E%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D4438504.8827B%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D4438504.8827B%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.197]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D443852B8827Eaceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/20vgF9oCHI6rfy-kiskZlBa3uiY>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Last Call for "Signalling ELC using OSPF"
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2016 16:49:55 -0000

Draft Authors,

Please confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed. If not, explain why? Each authors should respond explicitly to this list.

Thanks,
Acee

P.S. I realize some of you have already done this earlier in the process, and I appreciate your willingness to do it again.


From: OSPF <ospf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Date: Saturday, November 5, 2016 at 12:45 PM
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org<mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>
Subject: [OSPF] WG Last Call for "Signalling ELC using OSPF"

This begins the WG last call for  "Signalling ELC using OSPF”, https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-03.txt. Please review the document and send comments to this list prior to Nov 27th, 2016. Due to the IETF week, the last call period is going to be 3 weeks rather than usual 2 weeks.

Thanks,
Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email