[OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (4257)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 04 February 2015 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FC01A000F for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:40:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id urrT8iH9qkrm for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:40:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B523D1A0076 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:40:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 39F33181CF0; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:40:35 -0800 (PST)
To: jmoy@casc.com, akatlas@gmail.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, akr@cisco.com, acee@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150204234035.39F33181CF0@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:40:35 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/2ziNvVbRausw2nEJgYncapKkATw>
Cc: eugenkim@amazon.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, ospf@ietf.org
Subject: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (4257)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 23:40:55 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328,
"OSPF Version 2".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2328&eid=4257

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Eugene M. Kim <eugenkim@amazon.com>

Section: 2.1.1

Original Text
-------------
In NBMA mode, OSPF emulates operation over a broadcast
network: a Designated Router is elected for the NBMA
network, and the Designated Router originates an LSA for the
network. The graph representation for broadcast networks and
NBMA networks is identical. This representation is pictured
in the middle of Figure 1a.

Corrected Text
--------------
In NBMA mode, OSPF emulates operation over a broadcast
network: a Designated Router is elected for the NBMA
network, and the Designated Router originates an LSA for the
network. The graph representation for broadcast networks and
NBMA networks is identical. This representation is pictured
in the bottom of Figure 1a.

Notes
-----
The bottom, not middle, of Figure 1a depicts the identical graph representation of broadcast and NBMA networks.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC2328 (no draft string recorded)
--------------------------------------
Title               : OSPF Version 2
Publication Date    : April 1998
Author(s)           : J. Moy
Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG