Re: [OSPF] OSPFv2 Additional Authentication Methods - draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-01.txt
"Vishwas Manral" <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 06 February 2008 19:13 UTC
Return-Path: <ospf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ospf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ospf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393803A7094; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:13:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.359
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.240, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zGo5QZMHkjJk; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:13:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482D33A6DE6; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:13:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CF83A6D60 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:13:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21Q1Fj6P-Pug for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:13:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.186]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0C03A6F75 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:13:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a46so1215889rne.10 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:15:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.89.9 with SMTP id m9mr2145856wfb.35.1202325306836; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:15:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.102.19 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:15:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <77ead0ec0802061115gce3f662y7d44b33ee400de56@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:15:06 -0800
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com>
In-Reply-To: <6E9E173A-BB15-4561-B26D-86295256DE79@redback.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <6E9E173A-BB15-4561-B26D-86295256DE79@redback.com>
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPFv2 Additional Authentication Methods - draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ospf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Acee, As we have discussed privately, there are a couple of implementations - either in the process or on the cards. Thanks, Vishwas On Feb 5, 2008 3:21 PM, Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com> wrote: > Has anyone implemented this? Does anyone plan to implement this (and > cares to disclose it - a unicast to me is fine). We're trying gage > how close we are to WG last call. I've reviewed the draft and feel it > is pretty straight forward. > > Thanks, > Acee > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] OSPFv2 Additional Authentication Methods -… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] OSPFv2 Additional Authentication Metho… Vishwas Manral