[OSPF] OSPFv2 Additional Authentication Methods - draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-01.txt

Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com> Tue, 05 February 2008 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ospf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ospf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ospf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BFA3A6BA0; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:31:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.161
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.161 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.438, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W3jYtYFzfLs0; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB36E3A68E1; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:26:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0F23A68B2 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:26:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cSFKYrpISUa6 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:26:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prattle.redback.com (prattle.redback.com [155.53.12.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EAE3A69F3 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:19:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F0A7128A for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:21:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09831-10 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:21:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [???????IPv6???1] (login004.redback.com [155.53.12.57]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C8871288 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:21:31 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753)
Message-Id: <6E9E173A-BB15-4561-B26D-86295256DE79@redback.com>
To: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:21:30 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
Subject: [OSPF] OSPFv2 Additional Authentication Methods - draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ospf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org

Has anyone implemented this? Does anyone plan to implement this (and  
cares to disclose it - a unicast to me is fine). We're trying gage  
how close we are to WG last call. I've reviewed the draft and feel it  
is pretty straight forward.

Thanks,
Acee 
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf