Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 16 October 2014 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DD51A7D83 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JSWWwBN_kx8A for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4645E1A702B for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4233; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1413485407; x=1414695007; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=29Yo1sCfQVZpF88T/cV/FKXaqVGGP+WozmyNUV0+m64=; b=PA6ljBeiRZO0LXEUT1aMDje3tlbDqbfDcsF0nZb876mERIAyFG3FVoLc OGCzeSX4IIHRUG5SwMbzMWkAEhObE2Fnv8qMTCdU/+CrzjNgVdOSbqjnJ 8wxwPyvETZhFmTmG/nA6dT6Kcc0wjDc0nDRhcQ+aGGKI1HjsBQFZ+GeW7 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjgFAHESQFStJV2d/2dsb2JhbABbgkhGU04OzCCHTQKBGBYBfYQCAQEBBB1sAgEIBA0DAQIkBAcyFAkIAgQBEhuIIw3LIQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEVBJA8DQuESwWRf4RGhxKBMJBug36CNIFDbIFIgQIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.04,733,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="87637215"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2014 18:50:06 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com [173.37.183.85]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9GIo6Tn013052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:50:06 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.175]) by xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com ([173.37.183.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:50:06 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt)
Thread-Index: AQHP6XIA7gPesN4JFUeH87V5qWOYtw==
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:50:05 +0000
Message-ID: <D0658B3E.567B%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D041E4D5.3539%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D041E4D5.3539%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D0658B3E567Baceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/49d0cI2nOm6Fc_2YdDkMGw_2blY
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:50:09 -0000

The WG last call has ended and we received some minor comments. We we begin the process of requesting publication.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 at 1:49 PM
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org<mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions@tools.ietf.org>>
Subject: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt)


After more than 3 years of discussion and revision, the chairs feel that we are ready for a WG last call on the OSPF TE Metric extensions. While it is only one piece of an end-to-end delay/loss aware routing solution, we believe that the draft, as scoped, is ready. The WG last call will end at 12:00 AM PDT on Oct 4th, 2014. For your convenience, here is a URL:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions/

Thanks,
Acee and Abhay