IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 08 January 2018 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421D312D82C; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:22:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t7ScrjQu_ktT; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C559912D80F; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:22:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1800; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1515446541; x=1516656141; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=7IIrrNwsb/UpoGUNA+oKWNMgyYtcIQhZhvkwykRmFvA=; b=XHxV6H9lmmxKYWTIJ1AC4aP2Yrj8mTeyeG1w9jMcJ7Eo66kxIboXlfZ7 vlSIHzg4FesZzUWVbqR1jaSuq30I71KbXS/wF33jFi56wlI/J/t59Jyjl 4322FsHAnXkD6exOjAr9qLtUzMpR6YuezAFazQt0N9Jrt/cCEnk3xMf7Y s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ARAQBa4FNa/5hdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM/gVonB4QAiiSOW4sKjiKCFQqFOwIahBw/GAEBAQEBAQEBAWsohSQGIxFFEAIBCA4MAiYCAgIfERUQAgQBDQWKGQMVrmKCJ4c7DYJwAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYEPgxGCFYM/gy6Ca0WBboMXgmUFoyE9ApA8hQCUCY1yiHgCERkBgTsBHzmBUG8VgmeEV3iJXIEXAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,332,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="340507254"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jan 2018 21:22:20 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w08LMKCm029907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 21:22:20 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 16:22:19 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 16:22:19 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20
Thread-Index: AQHTiLPpWo32K2oClE6A4AfrPjhmK6NqfA0A
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 21:22:19 +0000
Message-ID: <D6794B10.E8D5F%acee@cisco.com>
References: <151543843917.11347.12095569886234420912@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151543843917.11347.12095569886234420912@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D4AAD2766E10F042954AB88490CBBE07@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/6BLGw5STY4grG5LFQV7bemNJYZM>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 21:22:23 -0000

Thanks for the review Mehmet.
Acee 

On 1/8/18, 2:07 PM, "Mehmet Ersue" <mersue@gmail.com> wrote:

>Reviewer: Mehmet Ersue
>Review result: Ready
>
>I reviewed the document "OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility"
>(draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-20.txt) as part of the Operational
>directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed
>by
>the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
>operational area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
>these
>comments just like any other last call comments.
>
>Intended status: Standards Track
>Current IESG state: In Last Call (ends 2018-01-11)
>IANA State: IANA - Review Needed
>Updates RFC 5340 (OSPF for IPv6) and RFC 5838 (Support of Address
>Families in
>OSPFv3)
>
>Summary:
>The document extends the Link State Advertisement (LSA) format by
>encoding the
>existing OSPFv3 LSA information in Type-Length-Value (TLV) tuples and
>allowing
>advertisement of additional information with additional TLVs.  The
>document
>provides backward compatibility mechanisms.
>
>There are no relevant nits in the document.
>
>I believe the document does not cause any issues related to operations and
>management. It has a clear language and looks ready for publication.
>
>Mehmet
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email