Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for "Hiding Transit-only Networks in OSPF " - <draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt>

Hi Yi,
The global addresses do need to be suppressed from OSPFv3 Link-LSAs since they are used by the DR to produce the Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA corresponding to the transit network  
Thanks,
Acee 

On Feb 22, 2012, at 8:21 AM, Yi Yang wrote:

> Hi Rajesh,
> 
> Thanks for your comments. I agree that prefix-hiding must not be configured on VL interface. But link-LSAs are not being used in SPF calculations.
> 
> Yi
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 20, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Rajesh wrote:
> 
>> Dear Acee,
>> 
>> Some more thoughts.
>> 
>> 1) In section 3 of this draft " Hiding IPv6 Transit-only Networks in OSPFv3"
>> We can also mention about LINK LSA. If the prefix hiding is configured on a
>> interface, then no need to mention global prefixes in Link LSA.
>> 
>> 2) For prefix hiding configuration option, may be we need to support OSPF
>> and OSPFv3 MIBs as well.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Rajesh
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Acee Lindem [mailto:acee.lindem@ericsson.com] 
>> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 7:49 PM
>> To: Rajesh
>> Cc: OSPF List
>> Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for "Hiding Transit-only Networks in
>> OSPF " - <draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt>
>> 
>> Hi Rajesh, 
>> 
>> On Feb 20, 2012, at 12:55 AM, Rajesh wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear Acee,
>>> 
>>> We can add one statement in section 3 of this draft [which is for OSPFv3]
>>> "LA-bit prefix we advertise in intra area prefix LSA for Virtual LINK IPv6
>>> address discovery, must not be taken from the interface where the prefix
>>> hiding is configured"
>> 
>> It is somewhat obvious that you wouldn't choose an address that is not
>> advertised. However, I guess it wouldn't hurt to add that the RFC 5340,
>> Section 4.4.3.9.  Intra-Area-Prefix-LSAs, selection an IPv6 address to
>> terminate virtual links will be modified to exclude interfaces with the
>> prefix hiding configured. 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Please check.
>>> 
>>> Thanks & Regards
>>> Rajesh
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ospf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Acee
>>> Lindem
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 10:37 PM
>>> Cc: OSPF List
>>> Subject: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for "Hiding Transit-only Networks in
>> OSPF
>>> " - <draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt>
>>> 
>>> As I have heard no objections, I'm beginning the 2 week OSPF Working Group
>>> last call for draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt.
>>> Please review the draft and post your last call comments prior to 12:00 AM
>>> PDT on February 23nd, 2012. 
>>> Here is a URL for your convenience: 
>>> 
>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Acee 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Acee Lindem wrote:
>>> 
>>>> As WG co-chair, I have reviewed this document and believe it is ready for
>>> OSPF WG last call. Any other opinions? 
>>>> There is at least one implementation. Here is a URL for you convenience:
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-01.txt
>>>> 
>>>> There is an IPR disclosure on this draft:
>>>> 
>>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1423/
>>>> 
>>>> I will start WG last call next week if I don't hear any objections.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Acee
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OSPF mailing list
>>>> OSPF@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSPF mailing list
>>> OSPF@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSPF mailing list
>> OSPF@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
> 