IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for "Hiding Transit-only Networks in OSPF " - <draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt>

Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> Mon, 20 February 2012 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA5B21F861D for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:20:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.503
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.096, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VCMZoZKGhwa for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:20:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA3A21F861C for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:20:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id q1KEJ7f9006895; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 08:19:29 -0600
Received: from EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.229]) by eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) with mapi; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:19:16 -0500
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
To: Rajesh <rajeshsm@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:19:15 -0500
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for "Hiding Transit-only Networks in OSPF " - <draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt>
Thread-Index: Aczv2qD6pRMFkqr/Q0StoD7qeO2rGw==
Message-ID: <368D3284-15EA-49C6-9868-5633EA079E8A@ericsson.com>
References: <84AB6152-7E34-4E21-9D2E-32DB3ACD93DE@ericsson.com> <529797C2-F390-4224-A1DC-EBDC5142BC9F@ericsson.com> <000501ccef94$2f162340$8d4269c0$@com>
In-Reply-To: <000501ccef94$2f162340$8d4269c0$@com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for "Hiding Transit-only Networks in OSPF " - <draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt>
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:20:06 -0000

Hi Rajesh, 

On Feb 20, 2012, at 12:55 AM, Rajesh wrote:

> Dear Acee,
> 
> We can add one statement in section 3 of this draft [which is for OSPFv3]
> "LA-bit prefix we advertise in intra area prefix LSA for Virtual LINK IPv6
> address discovery, must not be taken from the interface where the prefix
> hiding is configured"

It is somewhat obvious that you wouldn't choose an address that is not advertised. However, I guess it wouldn't hurt to add that the RFC 5340, Section 4.4.3.9.  Intra-Area-Prefix-LSAs, selection an IPv6 address to terminate virtual links will be modified to exclude interfaces with the prefix hiding configured. 

Thanks,
Acee



> 
> Please check.
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> Rajesh
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ospf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee
> Lindem
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 10:37 PM
> Cc: OSPF List
> Subject: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for "Hiding Transit-only Networks in OSPF
> " - <draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt>
> 
> As I have heard no objections, I'm beginning the 2 week OSPF Working Group
> last call for draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt.
> Please review the draft and post your last call comments prior to 12:00 AM
> PDT on February 23nd, 2012. 
> Here is a URL for your convenience: 
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee 
> 
> On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Acee Lindem wrote:
> 
>> As WG co-chair, I have reviewed this document and believe it is ready for
> OSPF WG last call. Any other opinions? 
>> There is at least one implementation. Here is a URL for you convenience:
>> 
>>  http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-01.txt
>> 
>> There is an IPR disclosure on this draft:
>> 
>>  http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1423/
>> 
>> I will start WG last call next week if I don't hear any objections.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSPF mailing list
>> OSPF@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email