Re: [OSPF] OSPF NBMA interface type
"Russ White" <russw@riw.us> Sat, 06 July 2013 18:24 UTC
Return-Path: <russw@riw.us>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581AE21F91B7 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 11:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.228
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.371, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w+kBudMS19px for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 11:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from da31.namelessnet.net (da31.namelessnet.net [74.124.205.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CC421F888F for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 11:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpe-174-106-045-093.ec.res.rr.com ([174.106.45.93] helo=USCSWHITER10L1C) by da31.namelessnet.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <russw@riw.us>) id 1UvX9k-0003n6-9Z; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:24:24 -0700
From: Russ White <russw@riw.us>
To: 'Acee Lindem' <acee@lindem.com>
References: <CAPLq3UMrj-JDcz4SoQrWWeuByoAupx1mzZmK-pVJZa38ngUrGQ@mail.gmail.com> <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE4719783A@eusaamb101.ericsson.se> <012301ce7a45$5f5178b0$1df46a10$@riw.us> <2C80107D-CB5C-4F74-9C52-BB699F163BB1@lindem.com>
In-Reply-To: <2C80107D-CB5C-4F74-9C52-BB699F163BB1@lindem.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 14:24:32 -0400
Message-ID: <000201ce7a76$108b3050$31a190f0$@riw.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQJrYtzbgsjIZbjA1KKZcJvzHetbIAITC6qpAYXQCV4CRelfrZfvL8AQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Seems clean. You should still use an Antivirus Scanner
Cc: ospf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF NBMA interface type
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 18:24:34 -0000
> OSPF MANET is has its own interface type (or should I say types since we > have multiple experimental RFCs). They are all closer to P2MP than NBMA. Yes, that's true --actually, I'd forgotten about the use of the P2MP type in the MANET space. > There is a lot machinery to support NBMA adjacency formation and polling. If > we were ever to do OSPFv4, I think it would be on the table for deprecation. Sure --if we're starting on a new protocol version, yes. Deprecating it in the current versions doesn't seem like it's worth the trouble (IMHO). :-) Russ
- [OSPF] OSPF NBMA interface type Glen Kent
- Re: [OSPF] OSPF NBMA interface type Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] OSPF NBMA interface type Russ White
- Re: [OSPF] OSPF NBMA interface type Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] OSPF NBMA interface type Russ White
- Re: [OSPF] OSPF NBMA interface type Acee Lindem