Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG Adoption of "draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend"

Glen Kent <glen.kent@gmail.com> Tue, 17 September 2013 09:48 UTC

Return-Path: <glen.kent@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FB711E83DB for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oYuJTy2AJ6NM for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C52E11E83C7 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id va2so5058204obc.15 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=WDh2g07eL7YmvnqKtBHRhb94Ax1D2AyNiCXCA01ZXwo=; b=VVXB5vVi2B38JhJOCkSZJDnpuqi7V5R0r7YBtJiJwvHgTBeNwNreJfMpI3bg3uUYJU X/8w15vbW9WPZiK1vO4G5iawVUbCDaKmIS1evGMP5gg0rm+L+SeYshM368MAn9quBaQN BBxU0FM8tehmII8Vbu9HNBAyasTtIxMCY+lelL1EnKPr4SMdiEYuwqG8Z6RpVAUBNfCp bJn7/VFWcdFCQdXhpV0o1rbqWa5lTTsIzYBzgLXARekNjgrAiNt+YxmKOwlEIExF36h4 PY3kBxu+1//QaTK/ERe8tVw2pn6gcpqrHEPq6SYIBI0L6HsZK5An9sHmEcoIFL3N/AIV 6Diw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.49.166 with SMTP id v6mr29149483obn.13.1379411290919; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.197.42 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE4703052A81@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
References: <20130910215422.31670.58526.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE4703052A81@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:18:10 +0530
Message-ID: <CAPLq3UN1OwAJp7fDdK+9f4Pyc0b-X7r4HkcYtEWe8o-an7Vpuw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Glen Kent <glen.kent@gmail.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5d2ea4fe9a6104e69137d2"
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG Adoption of "draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend"
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:48:12 -0000

Support.

This draft blurs yet another line of difference between ISIS and OSPF,
where folks from the former camp claimed that their LSPs were TLV encoded
and thus easily extensible, unlike OSPF which was hard encoded.

Glen


On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>wrote:

> This version includes changes in support of backward compatibility.
> Speaking as both a WG chair and author, this document is essential to
> OSPFv3 protocol extension. Please indicate your support or objections by
> September 30th, 2013.
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> On Sep 10, 2013, at 5:54 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>  <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend-02.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by Acee Lindem and posted to the
> > IETF repository.
> >
> > Filename:      draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend
> > Revision:      02
> > Title:                 OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility
> > Creation date:         2013-09-10
> > Group:                 Individual Submission
> > Number of pages: 29
> > URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend-02.txt
> > Status:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend
> > Htmlized:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend-02
> > Diff:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-acee-ospfv3-lsa-extend-02
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   OSPFv3 requires functional extension beyond what can readily be done
> >   with the fixed-format Link State Advertisement (LSA) as described in
> >   RFC 5340.  Without LSA extension, attributes associated with OSPFv3
> >   links and advertised IPv6 prefixes must be advertised in separate
> >   LSAs and correlated to the fixed-format LSA.  This document extends
> >   the LSA format by allowing the optional inclusion of Type-Length-
> >   Value (TLV) tuples in the LSAs.  Backward compatibility mechanisms
> >   are also described.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>