Re: [OSPF] New Version Notification for draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02.txt

Anton Smirnov <asmirnov@cisco.com> Tue, 08 July 2014 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <asmirnov@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D531B27E7 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 03:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PknK_2UdKeH7 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 03:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 150AE1A0205 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 03:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3512; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1404816744; x=1406026344; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hcdPOyBekO5r5D9Ip/SYInMNPZyTu5OyrMlHhEYshsY=; b=OAO36dpVWUjUkKUJEkhzH1aG/o/OrFh3K288suopw3zu9jyWHZbupWHB g+ctmE5790o3VVvm/p5BEWtKAeFRNrAstGfrdi+ZNN+dWKHjYZGDp+uk3 yykkSSqVYidsOUNO6vfvW2xtz8CC7ux0wMWpEfWOsxf7MNtg+5zVQglxn 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqQEAADMu1OtJssW/2dsb2JhbABZg2C/TYdEAYEsdYN7CAEBAQQBAQEvAQU2CQEBDAQLEQMBAgEJFg8JAwIBAgEVKAgGBgcBBQIBAQWFbYJMDckUF48iBwaDAIE9AQSadoFIiyKHIoIBgUQ7Lw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,625,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="102435478"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Jul 2014 10:52:23 +0000
Received: from as-lnx.cisco.com (ams-asmirnov-8714.cisco.com [10.55.140.85]) (authenticated bits=0) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s68AqKdN001626 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 10:52:21 GMT
Message-ID: <53BBCD64.5090103@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 12:52:20 +0200
From: Anton Smirnov <asmirnov@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>, undisclosed-recipients:;
References: <20140702114717.7506.67351.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <53B3FF33.1000109@cisco.com> <C931C13D-E658-4551-814A-44B55DBCAC4A@ericsson.com> <87E367DF-B25B-4C0E-AB92-AAA175443DF4@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <87E367DF-B25B-4C0E-AB92-AAA175443DF4@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Authenticated-User: asmirnov
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/IRpddPB5xgHsBRPf5sa05oDCZHM
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] New Version Notification for draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 10:52:25 -0000

Support to accept as WG work.

Anton


On 07/03/2014 05:45 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’d like to start a 2 week OSPF WG adoption poll of the subject draft. The encodings are very close to those in the OSPFv2 draft (which is a WG document) other than the fact that they take advantage of the OSPFv3 LSA extensions which simplifies things. However, it makes a lot of sense to advance these drafts separately since the OSPFv2 draft is not dependent on any other drafts and there are existing implementations.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> On Jul 2, 2014, at 1:48 PM, Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Peter,
>> I will review this version and start the adoption poll.
>>
>> Others - please read and comment.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>> On Jul 2, 2014, at 8:46 AM, Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Acee, WG,
>>>
>>> I have updated the OSPFv3 SR extension draft.
>>>
>>> Given that OSPFv2 SR extension draft has been accepted as a WG item, it would make a lot of sense to make the OSPFv3 SR draft WG document as well.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02.txt
>>> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 04:47:17 -0700
>>> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>>> To: Stefano Previdi <sprevidi@cisco.com>, Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>, Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>, "Rob Shakir" <rob.shakir@bt.com>, Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>, "Wim Henderickx" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>, Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, Wim Henderickx <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>, Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>, Stefano Previdi <sprevidi@cisco.com>, Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>, "Rob Shakir" <rob.shakir@bt.com>, Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>
>>>
>>>
>>> A new version of I-D, draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02.txt
>>> has been successfully submitted by Peter Psenak and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>>
>>> Name:		draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension
>>> Revision:	02
>>> Title:		OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing
>>> Document date:	2014-07-02
>>> Group:		Individual Submission
>>> Pages:		29
>>> URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02.txt
>>> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension/
>>> Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02
>>> Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>   Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end
>>>   paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of
>>>   topological sub-paths, called "segments".  These segments are
>>>   advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF).
>>>
>>>   This draft describes the necessary OSPFv3 extensions that need to be
>>>   introduced for Segment Routing.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>