[OSPF] [Errata Verified] RFC6549 (4041)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 07 July 2014 21:06 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFF31B290B; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 14:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zHKck0Y6s4P3; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 14:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC211B28CC; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 14:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D5B1918001B; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 14:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: jyoung@gsu.edu, acee.lindem@ericsson.com, akr@cisco.com, sina@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140707210557.D5B1918001B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 14:05:57 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/OkGsZr8iaBfSBw7RIwLfn6Rog6o
Cc: ospf@ietf.org, akatlas@juniper.net, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [OSPF] [Errata Verified] RFC6549 (4041)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 21:06:24 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6549, "OSPFv2 Multi-Instance Extensions". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6549&eid=4041 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Jim Young <jyoung@gsu.edu> Date Reported: 2014-07-05 Verified by: Alia Atlas (IESG) Section: 8 Original Text ------------- 8. IANA Considerations The size of the AuType field is reduced from 16 octets to 8 octets. This changes the OSPF Authentication Codes registry in that the values 256-65535 are no longer defined and are therefore deprecated. There is no backward compatibility issue since this range of values was previously defined as "Reserved and should not be assigned". Corrected Text -------------- 8. IANA Considerations The size of the AuType field is reduced from 16 bits to 8 bits. This changes the OSPF Authentication Codes registry in that the values 256-65535 are no longer defined and are therefore deprecated. There is no backward compatibility issue since this range of values was previously defined as "Reserved and should not be assigned". Notes ----- Earlier in RFC6549 Section 2. OSPFv2 Instance Packet Encoding, Paragraph 2 states "All fields are as defined in [OSPFV2] except that the Instance ID field is new, and the AuType field is reduced to 8 bits from 16 bits without any change in meaning. The Instance ID field is defined as follows:". The proposed corrected text makes section 8 consistent with section 2. -------------------------------------- RFC6549 (draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-09) -------------------------------------- Title : OSPFv2 Multi-Instance Extensions Publication Date : March 2012 Author(s) : A. Lindem, A. Roy, S. Mirtorabi Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6549 (4041) RFC Errata System
- Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6549 (4… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] [Errata Verified] RFC6549 (4041) RFC Errata System