[OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6549 (4041)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 05 July 2014 20:49 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D8A1B2858 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 13:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HUu1Ie_6NdmX for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 13:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9624F1B284E for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 13:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id AB0CD1801AE; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 13:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: acee.lindem@ericsson.com, akr@cisco.com, sina@cisco.com, akatlas@gmail.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, akr@cisco.com, acee.lindem@ericsson.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140705204839.AB0CD1801AE@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 13:48:39 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/jpfP8_cZBap-0Fhx06GyArteaUM
Cc: ospf@ietf.org, jyoung@gsu.edu, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6549 (4041)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 20:49:00 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6549, "OSPFv2 Multi-Instance Extensions". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6549&eid=4041 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Jim Young <jyoung@gsu.edu> Section: 8 Original Text ------------- 8. IANA Considerations The size of the AuType field is reduced from 16 octets to 8 octets. This changes the OSPF Authentication Codes registry in that the values 256-65535 are no longer defined and are therefore deprecated. There is no backward compatibility issue since this range of values was previously defined as "Reserved and should not be assigned". Corrected Text -------------- 8. IANA Considerations The size of the AuType field is reduced from 16 bits to 8 bits. This changes the OSPF Authentication Codes registry in that the values 256-65535 are no longer defined and are therefore deprecated. There is no backward compatibility issue since this range of values was previously defined as "Reserved and should not be assigned". Notes ----- Earlier in RFC6549 Section 2. OSPFv2 Instance Packet Encoding, Paragraph 2 states "All fields are as defined in [OSPFV2] except that the Instance ID field is new, and the AuType field is reduced to 8 bits from 16 bits without any change in meaning. The Instance ID field is defined as follows:". The proposed corrected text makes section 8 consistent with section 2. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6549 (draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-09) -------------------------------------- Title : OSPFv2 Multi-Instance Extensions Publication Date : March 2012 Author(s) : A. Lindem, A. Roy, S. Mirtorabi Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6549 (4041) RFC Errata System
- Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6549 (4… Acee Lindem
- [OSPF] [Errata Verified] RFC6549 (4041) RFC Errata System