[OSPF] OSPF HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication

John Smith <jsmith4112003@yahoo.co.uk> Mon, 16 March 2009 01:02 UTC

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=BeHQQfhdmgC6q7RkW6UZF3toxrf3wl2/ghVdRkgssdt0xW8rJr1JNgTihBJFJJXHJK1utE6Scsb+9YYBcNh16IBntxHgGWEbhrHROiLL2+mHdPgwYCUmc4oG6zz9/8I367UujuWn0t8kWOjXI7ZVgRDZaWZ5y/Nd84hO6K6bQto=;
Message-ID: <414371.22999.qm@web27205.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:03:19 +0000
From: John Smith <jsmith4112003@yahoo.co.uk>
To: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [OSPF] OSPF HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication
Precedence: list

Hi OSPFers,

I was reading draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-03.txt and i think its good and very readable.However, a small nit with the draft: All references to other draft sections are off by 1 - thus a reference to section 3 and 5 in section 5.1 should be 4 and 6 really. :-)

Its been around for a long time now and i have never seen any opposition/changes. Is there a reason why its not close to WG LC yet?

John

P.S.

It seems as Dave reflected some time back, that OSPF is lagging far behind IS-IS and RIP as these WGs
(i know there is none for RIP) have already come out with RFCs
extending ISIS/RIP for HMAC-SHA support, while OSPF is still struggling on.

[OSPF] OSPF HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication John Smith
Re: [OSPF] OSPF HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentica… Vishwas Manral
Re: [OSPF] OSPF HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentica… Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
Re: [OSPF] OSPF HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentica… Tony Li
Re: [OSPF] OSPF HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentica… Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
Re: [OSPF] OSPF HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentica… Tony Li
Re: [OSPF] OSPF HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentica… Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
Re: [OSPF] OSPF HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentica… Acee Lindem