Re: [OSPF] OSPF HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication

Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 17 March 2009 03:13 UTC

Return-Path: <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE453A67F1 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BGIx3Nfs9631 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.228]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842EC3A6452 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l9so3114373rvb.49 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CvxrbpzESnbBsdOt5rQE1CnUY7x7agqPNwAMVCe0upY=; b=vhrvWioAHhuugaHybxwGwmhfMzf0W/pMOE4UjOECIQciLS8aHoGQQ7ylRPrJ5tIUxd Zq4ZsapjcZ88JIVGe25hNSgZF7qz+TnOIol+w08pzCd5qL9T8oTb9rjOCZW3TDVpzJcA BVqDWM6N/0eHz8hmIckweB/gLXImwNsMxLZNU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oe/5C8ntpN9g332Zp/qQwU9d1MeM7zGstHpE6f5yWUpw5RZuQcIROmufeInbBJKJAJ Zakeg9ZCL9KJSoavQuOhpLWHw+9OV7tK6yXWlIoYOvSQnpYT+OQcf3u6ZrdHZrvcUbRt x8b1gGynExwyCmKBBIC29EB/CiAkCYQRHFoMU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.230.11 with SMTP id c11mr2517723wfh.246.1237259681222; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <414371.22999.qm@web27205.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
References: <414371.22999.qm@web27205.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:14:41 -0700
Message-ID: <77ead0ec0903162014t14c50c31k24a26113c90778f9@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: John Smith <jsmith4112003@yahoo.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:13:59 -0000

Hi John,

Thanks for pointing this out. We will work on it.

Thanks,
Vishwas

On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 6:03 PM, John Smith <jsmith4112003@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi OSPFers,
>
> I was reading draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-03.txt and i think its good and very readable.However, a small nit with the draft: All references to other draft sections are off by 1 - thus a reference to section 3 and 5 in section 5.1 should be 4 and 6 really. :-)
>
> Its been around for a long time now and i have never seen any opposition/changes. Is there a reason why its not close to WG LC yet?
>
> John
>
> P.S.
>
> It seems as Dave reflected some time back, that OSPF is lagging far behind IS-IS and RIP as these WGs
> (i know there is none for RIP) have already come out with RFCs
> extending ISIS/RIP for HMAC-SHA support, while OSPF is still struggling on.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>