Re: [OSPF] OSPF Multi-Instance and Transport Instance

"Sadler, Jonathan B." <Jonathan.Sadler@tellabs.com> Fri, 27 February 2009 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <Jonathan.Sadler@tellabs.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668AC3A6849 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:56:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R0Snu+ZhwVpP for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:56:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.tellabs.com (mx4.tellabs.com [204.154.129.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D7F3A67B6 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:56:01 -0800 (PST)
X-SBRS: None
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,278,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="1277203497"
Received: from usnvwwms2c.hq.tellabs.com (HELO USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net) ([172.23.216.105]) by mx4-priv.tellabs.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2009 20:56:23 +0000
Received: from usnvwwasdve2k7b.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net ([172.23.195.46]) by USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:56:23 -0600
Received: from EX-NAP.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net ([172.23.211.71]) by usnvwwasdve2k7b.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net ([172.23.195.46]) with mapi; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:56:18 -0600
From: "Sadler, Jonathan B." <Jonathan.Sadler@tellabs.com>
To: David Ward <dward@cisco.com>, Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:56:21 -0600
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] OSPF Multi-Instance and Transport Instance
Thread-Index: AcmZHC4xmT5G90KkRwu+k1m7SILvlwAAXnow
Message-ID: <5292FFA96EC22A4386067E9DBCC0CD2B260DCE8530@EX-NAP.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net>
References: <A9450E2E-D05C-465F-AD82-FAEEFDD6134C@redback.com> <159A4DF0-A07B-4AB5-9221-AED32B43593B@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <159A4DF0-A07B-4AB5-9221-AED32B43593B@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Feb 2009 20:56:23.0233 (UTC) FILETIME=[D91B8310:01C9991D]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Multi-Instance and Transport Instance
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:56:02 -0000

I also support this concept and the related work on a mechanism.  As for the specifics of the mechanism, I'll leave it to more brilliant OSPF'ers.

Jonathan Sadler

-----Original Message-----
From: ospf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of David Ward
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 2:44 PM
To: Acee Lindem
Cc: OSPF List
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Multi-Instance and Transport Instance

I support this effort (and hope that OSPF catches up with the  
innovation and features in IS-IS.)

-DWard

On Feb 14, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:

> In Minneapolis, there was some interest in making these WG group  
> documents. Additionally, the AD have sponsored this activity given  
> that a solution is being actively pursued in the ISIS WG (though  
> significantly less powerful).
>
> There was one dissenting comment that one could achieve the same  
> results with a single instance given sufficient invention (aka, the  
> "even pigs can fly" argument). I've added text to the transport  
> instance draft as well as mechanisms and text enabling sparse  
> topologies that I believe clearly demonstrates the superiority of  
> this solution. Hence, I like to now ask if there is any further  
> reason not to make these WG documents?
>
> Here are the current versions:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-acee-ospf-multi-instance-02.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-acee-ospf-transport-instance-02.txt
>
> Thanks,
> Acee_______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
============================================================
The information contained in this message may be privileged
and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee
or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction,
dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and
deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs
============================================================