Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5449 (1697)
Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com> Mon, 02 March 2009 12:40 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@lindem.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170993A6AF8 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 04:40:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8+Gl+PJhARzX for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 04:40:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.123]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8035E3A6A2B for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 04:40:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.199] (really [66.57.18.13]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090302124042.LZHB8036.cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com@[10.0.1.199]>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:40:42 +0000
In-Reply-To: <200903012134.n21LYjZ7003535@boreas.isi.edu>
References: <200903012134.n21LYjZ7003535@boreas.isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <016975EE-45E6-4281-83F0-65DAFF067ABC@lindem.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:40:34 -0500
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, dang.nguyen@crc.ca, T.Clausen@computer.org, Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr, ospf@ietf.org, Philippe.Jacquet@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5449 (1697)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:40:20 -0000
RFC Editor, The right parenthesis is obviously missing. However, I'd disagree that the omission makes the text very ambiguous or confusing. Alfred - one thing that would be more useful would be if you reviewed the documents during WG or IETF Last Call rather than immediately after they become RFCs :^) Thanks, Acee On Mar 1, 2009, at 4:34 PM, RFC Errata System wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5449, > "OSPF Multipoint Relay (MPR) Extension for Ad Hoc Networks". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5449&eid=1697 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> > > Section: A., 2nd para > > Original Text > ------------- > The following terminology will be used in describing the > heuristics: > D(Y) is the degree of a 1-hop neighbor, router Y (where Y is a > member > | of N(i), defined as the number of neighbors of router Y, EXCLUDING > all the members of N(i) and EXCLUDING the router performing the > computation. The proposed heuristic can then be described as > follows. Begin with an empty Flooding-MPR set. Then: > > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The following terminology will be used in describing the > heuristics: > D(Y) is the degree of a 1-hop neighbor, router Y (where Y is a > member > | of N(i)), defined as the number of neighbors of router Y, EXCLUDING > all the members of N(i) and EXCLUDING the router performing the > computation. The proposed heuristic can then be described as > follows. Begin with an empty Flooding-MPR set. Then: > > > > Notes > ----- > A missing matching ')' makes the text very ambiguous and confusing. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC5449 (draft-ietf-ospf-manet-mpr-04) > -------------------------------------- > Title : OSPF Multipoint Relay (MPR) Extension for Ad > Hoc Networks > Publication Date : February 2009 > Author(s) : E. Baccelli, P. Jacquet, D. Nguyen, T. Clausen > Category : EXPERIMENTAL > Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5449 (1697) RFC Errata System
- Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5449 (1… Acee Lindem