Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3734)

[Acee Lindem <[e-mail]>]

I concur with this errata and would classify it as "editorial. 
Acee 

On Sep 23, 2013, at 11:53 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328,
> "OSPF Version 2".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2328&eid=3734
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Ramakrishna DTV <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 8.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>            The AuType specified in the packet must match the AuType
>            specified for the associated area.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>            The AuType specified in the packet must match the AuType
>            specified for the associated interface.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> In OSPFv2, authentication is configured per interface and not per area.
>    Appendix D clarifies this: "The authentication type is configurable on a per-interface
>    (or equivalently, on a per-network/subnet) basis."
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC2328 (no draft string recorded)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : OSPF Version 2
> Publication Date    : April 1998
> Author(s)           : J. Moy
> Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
> Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG