[OSPF] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-13: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 24 January 2018 02:54 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, ospf-chairs@ietf.org, acee@cisco.com, ospf@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151676244812.24129.4910890731162163347.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:54:08 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/a4WrdiymqzOzJfs9buryZY7Fohc>
Subject: [OSPF] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-13: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

-8: It would be helpful to see a few sentences about how the security
considerations in 2328 and 5340 apply to the mechanisms in this draft, rather
than just a "no new considerations" assertion.

[OSPF] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell