Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09

Vishwas Manral <Vishwas@SINETT.COM> Wed, 06 July 2005 10:30 UTC

Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dq7B7-00031Q-W3 for ospf-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 06:30:54 -0400
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA20688 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 06:30:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <11.0109C343@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 6:30:52 -0400
Received: by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.4) with spool id 78159441 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 06:30:51 -0400
Received: from 63.197.255.158 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0l) with TCP; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 06:30:51 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09
Thread-Index: AcWCFIHmB/pvim1dQxWcchEsbEmmUQAAEQWw
Message-ID: <BB6D74C75CC76A419B6D6FA7C38317B28A28FC@sinett-sbs.SiNett.LAN>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 03:31:04 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Vishwas Manral <Vishwas@SINETT.COM>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Vivek,

Is there a reason we need to support compatibility with an older version of OSPFv2 (RFC1583) in OSPFv3?

Regarding a previous mail of yours
"ospfv3AreaSummary: The variable should also effect NSSA areas. Description should be updated"
We will update the description to also state NSSA (to be consistent with OSPFv2 MIB).

Thanks,
Vishwas
________________________________________
From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM] On Behalf Of Vivek Dubey
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 3:53 PM
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Subject: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09

No configuration support is provided for "ospfRFC1583Compatibility " in OSPFv3?

Thanks
Vivek




On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 Dilip Kumar wrote :
>Hi,
>    I would like to know if Router Address TLV's value field MUST
>contain a syntatically correct IP Address. I mean, is it OK if an OSPF
>router advertises Opaque LSA (TE) with an syntatically incorrect IP
>address (ex. 0.0.0.54 etc.) in Router Address TLV ?
>
>Thanks,
>Dilip