Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)

Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com> Tue, 11 October 2011 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@lindem.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8193C21F8B08 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6LdeuRF05SBY for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.123]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11CB21F8AE6 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=F07b8ZsgLWZXGX8D4wUqVhnmZNKPLwOf2MHA3we2PYM= c=1 sm=0 a=g3L3RsfpP9oA:10 a=Wma4Of2gTTwA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=C2g1Hp6idNFTy4K9KrF8yg==:17 a=BqEg4_3jAAAA:8 a=tt9SZfeFAAAA:8 a=OIVRlTfHAAAA:8 a=AUd_NHdVAAAA:8 a=vI_dY4GQAAAA:8 a=AEDFM0qtAAAA:8 a=0FD05c-RAAAA:8 a=1RTuLK3dAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=X3JhBpYG6cQvVotxFasA:9 a=BJDY9egIidHeMjdalRYA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=mhd2NDuUijAA:10 a=1eQkaoUQ5BgA:10 a=PTakdDTavvIA:10 a=1vLRZECtGpgA:10 a=JfD0Fch1gWkA:10 a=UmnohBiOdKAA:10 a=jqlaW5bC1iAA:10 a=f7GxY0FH8QIA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=C2g1Hp6idNFTy4K9KrF8yg==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
X-Originating-IP: 65.190.0.120
Received: from [65.190.0.120] ([65.190.0.120:49576] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from <acee@lindem.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id FF/79-14490-CF9939E4; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:21:02 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com>
In-Reply-To: <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350D006D541C@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:21:00 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4BDDAD34-A4D2-43DD-AF39-4D98F4191B46@lindem.com>
References: <20111011005119.2D6DA98C276@rfc-editor.org> <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350D006D541C@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.manral@hp.com>, dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn, rja@extremenetworks.com, mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:21:03 -0000

RFC-Editor(s),
Can you simply update the html link as Manav suggests?
Thanks,
Acee
On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:

> Yes, the link is incorrect in the HTML version of the RFC. I don't remember giving the URL and don't know how it was inserted in the HTML version. Cant we just fix the HTML page to point to RFC 2328 Appendix D instead of pointing to RFC 5709 Appendix D (which does not even exist!)?
> 
> There is no problem with the TXT version of the RFC. 
> 
> Cheers, Manav
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:21 AM
>> To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); vishwas@ipinfusion.com; 
>> mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com; riw@cisco.com; 
>> mjbarnes@cisco.com; tony.li@tony.li; rja@extremenetworks.com; 
>> stbryant@cisco.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk; 
>> acee.lindem@ericsson.com; akr@cisco.com
>> Cc: dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn; ospf@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
>> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)
>> 
>> 
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5709,
>> "OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication".
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5709&eid=2989
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Dai Wenjie (David Jet) <dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn>
>> 
>> Section: 3.
>> 
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>>   With the additions in this document, the currently valid 
>> algorithms    (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic 
>> Authentication include:             Keyed-MD5               
>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D)
>> 
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>>   With the additions in this document, the currently valid 
>> algorithms    (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic 
>> Authentication include:             Keyed-MD5               
>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D)
>> 
>> Notes
>> -----
>> The link 'Appendix D' referenced is incorrect. It is now 
>> 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709#appendix-D', and it 
>> should be 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2328#appendix-D'. 
>> Pay attention to the difference of the numbers in links,please.
>> 
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, 
>> please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be 
>> verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the 
>> verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and 
>> edit the report, if necessary. 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC5709 (draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-07)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication
>> Publication Date    : October 2009
>> Author(s)           : M. Bhatia, V. Manral, M. Fanto, R. 
>> White, M. Barnes, T. Li, R. Atkinson
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
>> Area                : Routing
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf