Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)
Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com> Tue, 11 October 2011 01:21 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@lindem.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8193C21F8B08 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6LdeuRF05SBY for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.123]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11CB21F8AE6 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=F07b8ZsgLWZXGX8D4wUqVhnmZNKPLwOf2MHA3we2PYM= c=1 sm=0 a=g3L3RsfpP9oA:10 a=Wma4Of2gTTwA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=C2g1Hp6idNFTy4K9KrF8yg==:17 a=BqEg4_3jAAAA:8 a=tt9SZfeFAAAA:8 a=OIVRlTfHAAAA:8 a=AUd_NHdVAAAA:8 a=vI_dY4GQAAAA:8 a=AEDFM0qtAAAA:8 a=0FD05c-RAAAA:8 a=1RTuLK3dAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=X3JhBpYG6cQvVotxFasA:9 a=BJDY9egIidHeMjdalRYA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=mhd2NDuUijAA:10 a=1eQkaoUQ5BgA:10 a=PTakdDTavvIA:10 a=1vLRZECtGpgA:10 a=JfD0Fch1gWkA:10 a=UmnohBiOdKAA:10 a=jqlaW5bC1iAA:10 a=f7GxY0FH8QIA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=C2g1Hp6idNFTy4K9KrF8yg==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
X-Originating-IP: 65.190.0.120
Received: from [65.190.0.120] ([65.190.0.120:49576] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from <acee@lindem.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id FF/79-14490-CF9939E4; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:21:02 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com>
In-Reply-To: <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350D006D541C@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:21:00 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4BDDAD34-A4D2-43DD-AF39-4D98F4191B46@lindem.com>
References: <20111011005119.2D6DA98C276@rfc-editor.org> <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350D006D541C@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.manral@hp.com>, dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn, rja@extremenetworks.com, mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:21:03 -0000
RFC-Editor(s), Can you simply update the html link as Manav suggests? Thanks, Acee On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote: > Yes, the link is incorrect in the HTML version of the RFC. I don't remember giving the URL and don't know how it was inserted in the HTML version. Cant we just fix the HTML page to point to RFC 2328 Appendix D instead of pointing to RFC 5709 Appendix D (which does not even exist!)? > > There is no problem with the TXT version of the RFC. > > Cheers, Manav > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:21 AM >> To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); vishwas@ipinfusion.com; >> mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com; riw@cisco.com; >> mjbarnes@cisco.com; tony.li@tony.li; rja@extremenetworks.com; >> stbryant@cisco.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk; >> acee.lindem@ericsson.com; akr@cisco.com >> Cc: dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn; ospf@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) >> >> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5709, >> "OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5709&eid=2989 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Dai Wenjie (David Jet) <dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn> >> >> Section: 3. >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> With the additions in this document, the currently valid >> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic >> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 >> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> With the additions in this document, the currently valid >> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic >> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 >> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >> >> Notes >> ----- >> The link 'Appendix D' referenced is incorrect. It is now >> 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709#appendix-D', and it >> should be 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2328#appendix-D'. >> Pay attention to the difference of the numbers in links,please. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, >> please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be >> verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the >> verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and >> edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC5709 (draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-07) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication >> Publication Date : October 2009 >> Author(s) : M. Bhatia, V. Manral, M. Fanto, R. >> White, M. Barnes, T. Li, R. Atkinson >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP >> Area : Routing >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) RFC Errata System
- Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2… Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
- Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2… Acee Lindem