Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)
Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> Tue, 11 October 2011 22:19 UTC
Return-Path: <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BA021F8DE8 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.175
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.175 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.176, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2V62Cgz4xaRs for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB14C21F8CF3 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id p9BMJfLF012422; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:43 -0500
Received: from EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.60]) by eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) with mapi; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:19:35 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
To: Alice Hagens <ahagens@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:19:32 -0400
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)
Thread-Index: AcyIY9sI4vDSa+UUROOLxATB77g0AA==
Message-ID: <85A7C3DE-7455-46E8-A47A-16842B91B952@ericsson.com>
References: <20111011005119.2D6DA98C276@rfc-editor.org> <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350D006D541C@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> <4BDDAD34-A4D2-43DD-AF39-4D98F4191B46@lindem.com> <E9775973-9307-4F0B-945A-B065EB7BCAF8@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <E9775973-9307-4F0B-945A-B065EB7BCAF8@amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-22-761956573"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.manral@hp.com>, "dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn" <dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn>, RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>, "mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com" <mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:19:50 -0000
Hi Alice, Thanks for the information. In the hopes of dispensing of this matter quickly, I have opened a tools ticket on this issue: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/tools/trac/ticket/6 Can you close this errata as "Rejected"? If not, I'll advise Steward to do it (WG chairs don't have the authority). Thanks, Acee On Oct 11, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Alice Hagens wrote: > Acee, Manav, > > The HTML versions of RFCs available from tools.ietf.org (e.g., http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709) are created and maintained by the Tools Team, not the RFC Editor. They are automatically created by running rfcmarkup (http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/) on the text of the RFC. In short, the link on http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709 was automatically created based on parsing the string "RFC 2328, Appendix D". > > As noted on http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php, errata are for the RFCs as available from rfc-editor.org, e.g., http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5709.txt. > > The verifiers (Area Directors) have the ability to edit the contents of the errata report. Perhaps the Corrected Text could convey the intended correction, maybe "Keyed-MD5 (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D, as updated by this document)", and the content of the Notes could be removed. > > Thank you. > RFC Editor/ah > > On Oct 10, 2011, at 9:21 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > >> RFC-Editor(s), >> Can you simply update the html link as Manav suggests? >> Thanks, >> Acee >> On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote: >> >>> Yes, the link is incorrect in the HTML version of the RFC. I don't remember giving the URL and don't know how it was inserted in the HTML version. Cant we just fix the HTML page to point to RFC 2328 Appendix D instead of pointing to RFC 5709 Appendix D (which does not even exist!)? >>> >>> There is no problem with the TXT version of the RFC. >>> >>> Cheers, Manav >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:21 AM >>>> To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); vishwas@ipinfusion.com; >>>> mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com; riw@cisco.com; >>>> mjbarnes@cisco.com; tony.li@tony.li; rja@extremenetworks.com; >>>> stbryant@cisco.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk; >>>> acee.lindem@ericsson.com; akr@cisco.com >>>> Cc: dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn; ospf@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >>>> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) >>>> >>>> >>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5709, >>>> "OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication". >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> You may review the report below and at: >>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5709&eid=2989 >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> Type: Editorial >>>> Reported by: Dai Wenjie (David Jet) <dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn> >>>> >>>> Section: 3. >>>> >>>> Original Text >>>> ------------- >>>> With the additions in this document, the currently valid >>>> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic >>>> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 >>>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >>>> >>>> Corrected Text >>>> -------------- >>>> With the additions in this document, the currently valid >>>> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic >>>> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 >>>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >>>> >>>> Notes >>>> ----- >>>> The link 'Appendix D' referenced is incorrect. It is now >>>> 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709#appendix-D', and it >>>> should be 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2328#appendix-D'. >>>> Pay attention to the difference of the numbers in links,please. >>>> >>>> Instructions: >>>> ------------- >>>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, >>>> please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be >>>> verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the >>>> verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and >>>> edit the report, if necessary. >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> RFC5709 (draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-07) >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> Title : OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication >>>> Publication Date : October 2009 >>>> Author(s) : M. Bhatia, V. Manral, M. Fanto, R. >>>> White, M. Barnes, T. Li, R. Atkinson >>>> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >>>> Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP >>>> Area : Routing >>>> Stream : IETF >>>> Verifying Party : IESG >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OSPF mailing list >>> OSPF@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> >
- [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) RFC Errata System
- Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2… Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
- Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2… Acee Lindem