Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)

Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> Tue, 11 October 2011 22:19 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BA021F8DE8 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.175
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.175 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.176, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2V62Cgz4xaRs for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB14C21F8CF3 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id p9BMJfLF012422; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:43 -0500
Received: from EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.60]) by eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) with mapi; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:19:35 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
To: Alice Hagens <ahagens@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:19:32 -0400
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)
Thread-Index: AcyIY9sI4vDSa+UUROOLxATB77g0AA==
Message-ID: <85A7C3DE-7455-46E8-A47A-16842B91B952@ericsson.com>
References: <20111011005119.2D6DA98C276@rfc-editor.org> <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350D006D541C@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> <4BDDAD34-A4D2-43DD-AF39-4D98F4191B46@lindem.com> <E9775973-9307-4F0B-945A-B065EB7BCAF8@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <E9775973-9307-4F0B-945A-B065EB7BCAF8@amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-22-761956573"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.manral@hp.com>, "dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn" <dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn>, RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>, "mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com" <mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:19:50 -0000

Hi Alice,

Thanks for the information. In the hopes of dispensing of this matter quickly, I have opened a tools ticket on this issue:

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/tools/trac/ticket/6

Can you close this errata as "Rejected"? If not, I'll advise Steward to do it (WG chairs don't have the authority). 

Thanks,
Acee 


On Oct 11, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Alice Hagens wrote:

> Acee, Manav,
> 
> The HTML versions of RFCs available from tools.ietf.org (e.g., http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709) are created and maintained by the Tools Team, not the RFC Editor. They are automatically created by running rfcmarkup (http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/) on the text of the RFC. In short, the link on http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709 was automatically created based on parsing the string "RFC 2328, Appendix D".
> 
> As noted on http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php, errata are for the RFCs as available from rfc-editor.org, e.g., http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5709.txt.
> 
> The verifiers (Area Directors) have the ability to edit the contents of the errata report.  Perhaps the Corrected Text could convey the intended correction, maybe "Keyed-MD5  (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D, as updated by this document)", and the content of the Notes could be removed.
> 
> Thank you.
> RFC Editor/ah
> 
> On Oct 10, 2011, at 9:21 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
> 
>> RFC-Editor(s),
>> Can you simply update the html link as Manav suggests?
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>> On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes, the link is incorrect in the HTML version of the RFC. I don't remember giving the URL and don't know how it was inserted in the HTML version. Cant we just fix the HTML page to point to RFC 2328 Appendix D instead of pointing to RFC 5709 Appendix D (which does not even exist!)?
>>> 
>>> There is no problem with the TXT version of the RFC. 
>>> 
>>> Cheers, Manav
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] 
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:21 AM
>>>> To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); vishwas@ipinfusion.com; 
>>>> mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com; riw@cisco.com; 
>>>> mjbarnes@cisco.com; tony.li@tony.li; rja@extremenetworks.com; 
>>>> stbryant@cisco.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk; 
>>>> acee.lindem@ericsson.com; akr@cisco.com
>>>> Cc: dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn; ospf@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
>>>> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5709,
>>>> "OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication".
>>>> 
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5709&eid=2989
>>>> 
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> Type: Editorial
>>>> Reported by: Dai Wenjie (David Jet) <dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn>
>>>> 
>>>> Section: 3.
>>>> 
>>>> Original Text
>>>> -------------
>>>> With the additions in this document, the currently valid 
>>>> algorithms    (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic 
>>>> Authentication include:             Keyed-MD5               
>>>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D)
>>>> 
>>>> Corrected Text
>>>> --------------
>>>> With the additions in this document, the currently valid 
>>>> algorithms    (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic 
>>>> Authentication include:             Keyed-MD5               
>>>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D)
>>>> 
>>>> Notes
>>>> -----
>>>> The link 'Appendix D' referenced is incorrect. It is now 
>>>> 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709#appendix-D', and it 
>>>> should be 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2328#appendix-D'. 
>>>> Pay attention to the difference of the numbers in links,please.
>>>> 
>>>> Instructions:
>>>> -------------
>>>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, 
>>>> please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be 
>>>> verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the 
>>>> verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and 
>>>> edit the report, if necessary. 
>>>> 
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> RFC5709 (draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-07)
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> Title               : OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication
>>>> Publication Date    : October 2009
>>>> Author(s)           : M. Bhatia, V. Manral, M. Fanto, R. 
>>>> White, M. Barnes, T. Li, R. Atkinson
>>>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>>> Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
>>>> Area                : Routing
>>>> Stream              : IETF
>>>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSPF mailing list
>>> OSPF@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>> 
>