Re: some clarifications....
"Manral, Vishwas" <VishwasM@NETPLANE.COM> Tue, 04 February 2003 10:33 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA15416 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 05:33:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <15.008CB7EE@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 5:36:56 -0500
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 601460 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 05:36:56 -0500
Received: from 12.27.183.253 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 05:36:56 -0500
Received: by XOVER with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1HXT8ZGS>; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 05:36:39 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <E7E13AAF2F3ED41197C100508BD6A328791E82@india_exch.hyderabad.mindspeed.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 05:38:52 -0500
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: "Manral, Vishwas" <VishwasM@NETPLANE.COM>
Subject: Re: some clarifications....
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Hi Alok, > what is the default behaviour of OSPF process on a node A when a neighbour B > and node A loose DD synhcronization? > i mean , i understand the OSPF FSM, but at that point, does it > 1. flush all routes which were given by the neighbour and then restart the > whoel thing till the FULL state? > > 2. retain them till FULL state and flush it only when one enters the "FULL" > state again? You cannot loose DB syncronization, unless you loose your adjacency(as flooding in OSPF is relaible). You may however want to check the draft http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nguyen-ospf-oob-resync-01.txt. We never flush routes in OSPF, we flush LSA's. When an adjacency is lost/new adjacency gained, a new router/network LSA is generated the SPF algorithm takes care of excluding/including the neighbor from the routing table calculation. Check Section 12, RFC2328. We do not the flush other routers LSA's. Thanks, Vishwas
- some clarifications.... alok
- Re: some clarifications.... Manral, Vishwas
- Re: some clarifications.... alok
- Re: some clarifications.... Manral, Vishwas