Re: Status of "alternative ABR implementations" draft?

Alex Zinin <zinin@PSG.COM> Thu, 22 August 2002 15:43 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA29745 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:43:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <17.006E5C82@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:44:51 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 87553 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:44:51 -0400
Received: from 147.28.0.62 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:44:51 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] helo=127.0.0.1) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17hu8g-000LU8-00; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 08:44:50 -0700
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Personal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
References: <Pine.A41.4.31.0208221455480.49770-100000@pandora.inf.elte.hu> <3D64F018.30704@redback.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <154138479513.20020822084321@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 08:43:21 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Alex Zinin <zinin@PSG.COM>
Subject: Re: Status of "alternative ABR implementations" draft?
Comments: To: Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM>
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <3D64F018.30704@redback.com>
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Acee,

>> I would like to know the current status of the
>> draft-ietf-ospf-abr-alt-04.txt document. It is listed on the workgroup's
>> homepage at http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ospf-charter.html but
>> according to its header, it expired last September.

> I believe the draft is going to be published as an informational RFC. I'll
> ping Alex to see where we stand with the last set of comments.

I think I have all comments from the AD-review round incorporated
in my latest version. Let me double check it and I will resubmit
the final revision of the draft.

Alex