Re: [p2prg] draft-irtf-p2prg-mythbustering

Volker Hilt <volkerh@bell-labs.com> Fri, 25 May 2012 06:35 UTC

Return-Path: <volker.hilt@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: p2prg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2prg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B3211E80F4 for <p2prg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2012 23:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mYVTME0SQnbJ for <p2prg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2012 23:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [62.23.212.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DC311E80F1 for <p2prg@irtf.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 23:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id q4P6YtvP015216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 25 May 2012 08:34:55 +0200
Received: from [135.244.177.133] (135.120.57.7) by FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (135.120.45.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Fri, 25 May 2012 08:34:55 +0200
Message-ID: <4FBF280B.4000301@bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 08:34:51 +0200
From: Volker Hilt <volkerh@bell-labs.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "p2prg@irtf.org" <p2prg@irtf.org>
References: <4FBCFB40.9030009@telecomitalia.it>
In-Reply-To: <4FBCFB40.9030009@telecomitalia.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.80
Subject: Re: [p2prg] draft-irtf-p2prg-mythbustering
X-BeenThere: p2prg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer Research Group <p2prg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/p2prg>, <mailto:p2prg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/p2prg>
List-Post: <mailto:p2prg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2prg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2prg>, <mailto:p2prg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 06:35:01 -0000

Folks,

this draft was written to summarize the discussions of the RG on P2P 
traffic localization and its pitfalls. We decided to keep the draft open 
so new issues, solutions to problems or measurements can be added. Now 
it is the time to wrap up the work on the draft and get it published.

However, we need YOUR help!!

We need volunteers who can do a quick review of the draft mainly to do a 
sanity check that the discussion is still accurate. The draft is fairly 
short and so this should be a quick (and enjoyable) read. Here is a link 
to the draft:

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-irtf-p2prg-mythbustering-01.txt

Please send a quick email to the authors and the chairs if you'd like to 
help with a quick review.

Thanks,

Volker






On 5/23/2012 4:59 PM, Enrico Marocco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the draft was put together in this group and has been kept alive for a
> long time, to both stimulate and keep track of discussions on the
> possible effects of localization of traffic generated by peer-to-peer
> applications. Now that the discussion has cooled down and a common
> understanding has formed on almost all the issues it deals with, the
> authors believe it has served its purpose and are not interested in
> updating it in any substantial way any more. If the RG and the chairs
> believe it would be of any value, they are however available to provide
> their support for the publication process, to get an informational RFC
> out of it.
>
> Enrico
>