RE: [P2PSIP] Concepts draft

 Newton had said that:"I succeed because I stand on the shoulder of
Giants"(maybe), this tell us that, if we want success, just stand "on"(
not parallelly) the shoulder.:)!
 so "WG Concepts document can define any terms we think are useful." is
the best choice!
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Matthews [mailto:philip_matthews@magma.ca] 
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 9:31 AM
To: Henry Sinnreich
Cc: P2PSIP Mailing List
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Concepts draft

On 31-Aug-07, at 17:47 , Henry Sinnreich wrote:
> We may also want to think if the concepts and glossary should be
> (1) one
> and the same paper or (2) we may be better off (IMHO) with a separate 
> glossary that includes SIP, but is not necessarily focused only on SIP

> alone.

I don't understand why you want a separate glossary document, given that
the Concepts document already has a glossary (=
Terminology) section.

Are you saying that draft-willis-p2psip-concepts was a poor starting
point for the WG Concepts document?

In my opinion, as both a co-author of the current document and as a WG
participant, the WG Concepts document can define any terms we think are
useful.

- Philip

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
P2PSIP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
P2PSIP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip