Re: [P2PSIP] Concepts draft

On 31-Aug-07, at 17:47 , Henry Sinnreich wrote:
> We may also want to think if the concepts and glossary should be  
> (1) one
> and the same paper or (2) we may be better off (IMHO) with a separate
> glossary that includes SIP, but is not necessarily focused only on SIP
> alone.

I don't understand why you want a separate glossary document,
given that the Concepts document already has a glossary (=  
Terminology) section.

Are you saying that draft-willis-p2psip-concepts was a poor starting  
point
for the WG Concepts document?

In my opinion, as both a co-author of the current document and as a  
WG participant,
the WG Concepts document can define any terms we think are useful.

- Philip

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
P2PSIP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip