Re: [P2PSIP] List followup of meeting consensus: Hums on self-tuning

[Enrico Marocco <[e-mail]>]

Ari Keranen wrote:
>> In the meeting at IETF-76 in Hiroshima, the group was asked to hum on:
>>
>> Does the group feel there should be a charter deliverable to address
>> the self-tuning problem.
>>
>> There was hum called in support of doing so.
>>
>> A second hum was asked, noting that there were few who had read it and
>> it was preliminary, but to see if there was a feeling that draft
>> draft-maenpaa-p2psip-self-tuning-01 was a good input toward a charter
>> deliverable to work in this area, please hum.
>>
>> There was a quiet but hum in support.
>>
>> We would like to confirm these hums on the mailing list. Please
>> comment on these hums.
> 
> +1 for chartering a deliverable for this and adopting 
> draft-maenpaa-p2psip-self-tuning-01 as the starting point.

As already said at the mic, +1 also from me. I really think this is an
essential functionality for any overlay expected to work in the real work.

-- 
Ciao,
Enrico