Re: [P2PSIP] List followup of meeting consensus: Hums on self-tuning

Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com> Tue, 17 November 2009 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com>
X-Original-To: p2psip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A0428C0CF for <p2psip@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:44:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kb6FfF5hNswU for <p2psip@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:44:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from n2.nomadiclab.com (n2.nomadiclab.com [IPv6:2001:14b8:400:101::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69AA3A693C for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:44:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by n2.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945A21EF271; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:44:48 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nomadiclab.com
Received: from n2.nomadiclab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inside.nomadiclab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vuB4suye-jiQ; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:44:48 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:14b8:400:101:21c:23ff:fe45:a6c1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400:101:21c:23ff:fe45:a6c1]) by n2.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EFE1EF125; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:44:47 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4B029ABF.4070806@nomadiclab.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:44:47 +0200
From: Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "David A. Bryan" <dbryan@ethernot.org>
References: <8b2769930911151220r372f019es3ea5384eaa999c25@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8b2769930911151220r372f019es3ea5384eaa999c25@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: P2PSIP WG <p2psip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] List followup of meeting consensus: Hums on self-tuning
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:44:52 -0000

David A. Bryan wrote:
> In the meeting at IETF-76 in Hiroshima, the group was asked to hum on:
> 
> Does the group feel there should be a charter deliverable to address
> the self-tuning problem.
> 
> There was hum called in support of doing so.
> 
> A second hum was asked, noting that there were few who had read it and
> it was preliminary, but to see if there was a feeling that draft
> draft-maenpaa-p2psip-self-tuning-01 was a good input toward a charter
> deliverable to work in this area, please hum.
> 
> There was a quiet but hum in support.
> 
> We would like to confirm these hums on the mailing list. Please
> comment on these hums.

+1 for chartering a deliverable for this and adopting 
draft-maenpaa-p2psip-self-tuning-01 as the starting point.


Cheers,
Ari