Re: [P2PSIP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-18: (with COMMENT)

"Thomas C. Schmidt" <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de> Sun, 17 April 2016 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B3C12DF90; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 10:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XTg80VnQo10r; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 10:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de (mx3.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de [141.22.6.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AD0312E0F7; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 10:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,498,1454972400"; d="scan'208";a="28169594"
Received: from post.haw-hamburg.de (HELO HUB02.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de) ([141.22.24.51]) by mail3.is.haw-hamburg.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 17 Apr 2016 19:11:37 +0200
Received: from CAS04.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de (2002:8d16:183f::8d16:183f) by HUB02.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de (2002:8d16:1833::8d16:1833) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 19:11:37 +0200
Received: from [192.168.178.90] (141.22.250.35) by haw-mailer.haw-hamburg.de (141.22.24.63) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 19:11:36 +0200
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <6c28177619b64d5abf49446a5c5ffdac@HUB01.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de>
From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de>
Message-ID: <5713C3BF.4090804@haw-hamburg.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 19:11:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c28177619b64d5abf49446a5c5ffdac@HUB01.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [141.22.250.35]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/p2psip/b1HkqPzlmjk-u3yDuK4F0LLRswI>
Cc: "p2psip-chairs@ietf.org" <p2psip-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-p2psip-sip@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-p2psip-sip@ietf.org>, "p2psip@ietf.org" <p2psip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft?= =?utf-8?q?-ietf-p2psip-sip-18=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/p2psip/>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 17:11:44 -0000

Hi Mirja,

o.k., the text is a bit sloppy. What it probably should say is that 
anonymity measures are not considered here.

A proposed re-write could be:

  8.2.4.  Privacy Issues

    All RELOAD SIP registration data is visible to all nodes in the
    overlay. Location privacy can be gained from using
    anonymous GRUUs. Methods of providing anonymity or deploying
    pseudonyms exist, but are beyond the scope of this document.

Would you agree on that?

Thomas

On 15.04.2016 22:56, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-18: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-sip/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The privacy issues text in the security consideration section sounds not
> very convincing:
>
> 8.2.4.  Privacy Issues
>
>     All RELOAD SIP registration data is visible to all nodes in the
>     overlay.  Methods of providing location and identity privacy are
>     still being studied.  Location privacy can be gained from using
>     anonymous GRUUs.
>
> Can you give more details or a reference regarding the methods that are
> still under study?
>

-- 

Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences                   Berliner Tor 7 °
° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group    20099 Hamburg, Germany °
° http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet                   Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 °
° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt    Fax: +49-40-42875-8409 °