IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [P2PSIP] WGLC for draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-09

"Michael Chen" <michaelc@idssoftware.com> Mon, 15 July 2013 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <michaelc@idssoftware.com>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2071F11E80DC for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.201, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qatmw333M1Cj for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plwbeout03-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtp03-02-2.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.218.214]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DACB11E81AB for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([72.167.218.243]) by p3plwbeout03-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id 0hjC1m0025FgiYg01hjCW9; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:43:12 -0700
X-SID: 0hjC1m0025FgiYg01
Received: (qmail 32208 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2013 17:43:12 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_4f85c63a79b7edc08f0475a12d565f31"
To: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@fhtw-berlin.de>
From: Michael Chen <michaelc@idssoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <51E3A2F6.7000503@fhtw-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:43:11 -0700
Message-Id: <20130715104311.59ca11a9ba9389561a029f06442e67fa.7643543509.mailapi@email03.secureserver.net>
X-Originating-IP: 172.249.4.226
User-Agent: MailAPI 24737
X-Sender: michaelc@idssoftware.com
Cc: p2psip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] WGLC for draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-09
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 17:43:22 -0000

Hi Thomas,
 
The change in sip-10 is not appropriate. Please refer to my Feb 14, 2012 comment:
 
  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip/current/msg06176.html
 
The keep-alive needed is for the application channel created from AppAttach, in this case should only carry SIP traffics. Therefore, RELOAD Ping is not appropriate.
 
Instead, p2psip-sip should simply mention these two techniques or select one of:
 
  http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5626#section-3.5
 
Thanks
 
--Michael
--------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] WGLC for draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-09
From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@fhtw-berlin.de>
Date: 7/15/13 12:21 am
To: "Michael Chen" <michaelc@idssoftware.com>
Cc: p2psip@ietf.org

Hi Michael, all,
 
 it's updated now ... as this doc is on last call, it would be good to 
 hear about all other comments/remarks by the Berlin meeting.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Thomas
 
 
 On 12.07.2013 18:32, Thomas C. Schmidt wrote:
 > Hi Michael,
 >
 > sorry for having missed your mail: we'll address in an update.
 >
 > Best,
 >
 > Thomas
 >
 > On 09.06.2013 17:36, Michael Chen wrote:
 >> Hi,
 >> Has the issue of keep-alive been addressed?
 >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip/current/msg06176.html
 >> Thanks
 >> --Michael
 >>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email