Re: [P2PSIP] WGLC for draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-09

"Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de> Sun, 21 July 2013 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB54011E8109 for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a2HZp9k6amS2 for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.rz.htw-berlin.de (mail2.rz.htw-berlin.de [141.45.10.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416DA11E8107 for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
Envelope-to: p2psip@ietf.org
Received: from e178190241.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.190.241] helo=[192.168.178.33]) by mail2.rz.htw-berlin.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>) id 1V11cP-000Ijd-JM; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 23:56:41 +0200
Message-ID: <51EC5916.3070205@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 23:56:38 +0200
From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Chen <michaelc@idssoftware.com>
References: <20130715104311.59ca11a9ba9389561a029f06442e67fa.7643543509.mailapi@email03.secureserver.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130715104311.59ca11a9ba9389561a029f06442e67fa.7643543509.mailapi@email03.secureserver.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-HTW-SPAMINFO: this message was scanned by eXpurgate (http://www.eleven.de)
X-HTW-DELIVERED-TO: p2psip@ietf.org
Cc: p2psip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] WGLC for draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-09
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 21:56:49 -0000

Hi Michael,

thanks again for the pointer - please see inline.

On 15.07.2013 19:43, Michael Chen wrote:
> The change in sip-10 is not appropriate. Please refer to my Feb 14, 2012
> comment:
>    http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip/current/msg06176.html
> The keep-alive needed is for the application channel created from
> AppAttach, in this case should only carry SIP traffics. Therefore,
> RELOAD Ping is not appropriate.

Yup - sorry, I was too quick. A new version of the draft can be 
provisionally obtained from 
http://inet.cpt.haw-hamburg.de/papers/draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-11.txt until 
the submission re-opens.

However, as we are talking about plain SIP connectivity, there is just a 
reference pointer useful ... nothing new here.

> Instead, p2psip-sip should simply mention these two techniques or select
> one of:
>    http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5626#section-3.5

We've added the reference - a selection of the techniques depends on the 
transport choice.

Cheers,

Thomas


>     --------- Original Message ---------
>     Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] WGLC for draft-ietf-p2psip-sip-09
>     From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@fhtw-berlin.de>
>     Date: 7/15/13 12:21 am
>     To: "Michael Chen" <michaelc@idssoftware.com>
>     Cc: p2psip@ietf.org
>
>     Hi Michael, all,
>
>     it's updated now ... as this doc is on last call, it would be good to
>     hear about all other comments/remarks by the Berlin meeting.
>
>     Cheers,
>
>     Thomas
>
>
>     On 12.07.2013 18:32, Thomas C. Schmidt wrote:
>      > Hi Michael,
>      >
>      > sorry for having missed your mail: we'll address in an update.
>      >
>      > Best,
>      >
>      > Thomas
>      >
>      > On 09.06.2013 17:36, Michael Chen wrote:
>      >> Hi,
>      >> Has the issue of keep-alive been addressed?
>      >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip/current/msg06176.html
>      >> Thanks
>      >> --Michael
>      >>
>

-- 

Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences                   Berliner Tor 7 °
° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group    20099 Hamburg, Germany °
° http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet                   Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 °
° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt    Fax: +49-40-42875-8409 °