RE: [P2PSIP] comments on using DHTs in wireless ad hoc networks

<marcin.matuszewski@nokia.com> Mon, 26 November 2007 10:16 UTC

Return-path: <p2psip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iwb0S-0003JP-Cc; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 05:16:00 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iwb0Q-0003JH-Ch for p2psip@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 05:15:58 -0500
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.105.134] helo=mgw-mx09.nokia.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iwb0P-0004R4-VX for p2psip@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 05:15:58 -0500
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id lAQAFjDO009258; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:16:02 -0600
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:15:38 +0200
Received: from esebe102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.217]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:15:38 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [P2PSIP] comments on using DHTs in wireless ad hoc networks
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:18:24 +0200
Message-ID: <3F18E76823C95E4795181D74BAC7664F057538D7@esebe102.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <618e24240711201011n547370bag5556ed3f9d9c958b@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [P2PSIP] comments on using DHTs in wireless ad hoc networks
Thread-Index: AcgroMzUNdDlMnVZQMi97M/rUGjjTAAoEQVw
References: <618e24240711201011n547370bag5556ed3f9d9c958b@mail.gmail.com>
From: marcin.matuszewski@nokia.com
To: victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com, p2psip@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Nov 2007 10:15:38.0112 (UTC) FILETIME=[4A6C5800:01C83015]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793
Cc:
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: p2psip-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Victor

>Are other solutions or DHT adaptations (e.g. CHR) considered depending on application scenario requirements?

Yes, you are right DHTs may not be optimal for small ad-hoc overlay networks. Depending on the scenario it may be easier and more efficient (overhead) to implement an unstructured overlays.
 
The P2PP allows for unstructured overlays as well.

Marcin
 
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Victor Pascual Ávila [mailto:victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com] 
>Sent: 20 November, 2007 20:11
>To: p2psip@ietf.org
>Subject: [P2PSIP] comments on using DHTs in wireless ad hoc networks
>
>Hi all,
>In "draft-bryan-p2psip-app-scenarios-00.txt", section 4.2 and 4.2.1.
>identifies  "Ad-Hoc and Ephemeral Groups" application 
>scenarios, and can be read:
>
>"Examples of such environment are isolated wireless ad-hoc 
>networks with no connection to the Internet or ad-hoc networks 
>with limited connectivity to the Internet in situations like 
>outdoor public events, emergencies, and battlefields."
>
>In "draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-01", section 5.1 describes "The 
>Distributed Database Function", and can be read:
>
>"A class of algorithms known as Distributed Hash Tables 
><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P2P_overlay> are one way to 
>implement the Distributed Database.  In particular, both the 
>Chord and Bamboo algorithms have been suggested as good 
>choices for the distributed database algorithm.  However, no 
>decision has been taken so far."
>
>Problem of implementing a distributed hash table in wireless 
>ad hoc networks is well-known. Scarceness of resources and 
>node mobility turn routing into a problem.
>
>Is there a consensus on using the same type of "Distributed 
>Database Function" (e.g. DHT) in all application scenarios? 
>Are other solutions or DHT adaptations (e.g. CHR) considered 
>depending on application scenario requirements?
>
>Thanks and sorry if this was already discussed,
>--
>Victor Pascual Ávila
>

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
P2PSIP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip