IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pals] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Mon, 13 November 2017 06:33 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4A31294A2; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:33:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WR9zN8jLDOMq; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:33:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 066421294B5; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:33:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id i5so11192771pfe.6; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:33:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rlqYCii0OtL8QbeDywGrF7bTGskp6NG+sEnBR3CGnx4=; b=eoA8w57jjMk/aISdNEsy3RMtFsDEV/iOm4HW+/n3E9D/NVq4RCXe1VFnC/8XKLCXUw 0iL6/31PAVPanPS21JlN+doysQiABww9G3aTdaNkIioZIEEbfE8y+fYFO6GME6BEYuq2 HZ1MI6qkGBV8L5jkwK3TLDqR24EWiHDdzrTfDycnzotdF3lLakuI/U2jDKwHpesTIkZC 9pPVsLRsTP3GUizGOruBLi1M1oC5HafQw83vhhRXurf6ABFgYFmJZ0pv+ug7fQ4RMOBn 4SBAbZdFBCy0jeSYHxhVzRIqI3X7RldNaV++f5enExDIHBJeRtkkkibpOic6pMI82ttq mc+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rlqYCii0OtL8QbeDywGrF7bTGskp6NG+sEnBR3CGnx4=; b=fGW8EkeURrgCcYySl/i2hd62Slf/Gn6pkcTBiKhtD98mmQ/j+eH36Iuxhsn1jRr/sP fcPh2bEdV18P6bfHN0o03/C0DasBvuBY4QcGIQEQDebdJ1KptqMauWyO0yti+6L1YgPy /u7YfZufP32Y8o3WcYplr4oUsvtOm6EX1z6t5sFRPFrQp9XW/w/slQ/qafrjfZ8jnnlx gUgk+maqETD4pSpWiGBMBWiiGwH1zeSofuUzLjbN/1NPus6dZOMj+0r3EGBu0Pm1Gtyc kHDxck2ifIrE5JFLiQ6drCYJdACLxbmTWCsdmTIknUsKPAwIvBwWi5fDvPw6ELHuanva C3pg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6bz4Xjvs3d1DfO9M5Sb95I8GFsNIrzUNBvbjVkSK70GiHujmjE mMeojeWOOofBGV3lorj8sDs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbkUM/kWhaOWQbA9oJFS6wBgbZs743Opgtnb1eyypponGTD4afJtiVIPQ5OxZnF/r23KLP4Ug==
X-Received: by 10.101.87.139 with SMTP id b11mr7872047pgr.314.1510554795352; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:1998:500e:7d66:ee01:4309? ([2001:67c:370:1998:500e:7d66:ee01:4309]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w184sm5152168pgb.36.2017.11.12.22.33.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2127F0E0-4880-4555-85EE-13A0EC9AD965@vmware.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:33:14 +0800
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw@ietf.org>, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C9534916-2B40-4E07-ADEC-DA109FB185B5@gmail.com>
References: <150414165129.16888.245048756650963482.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2127F0E0-4880-4555-85EE-13A0EC9AD965@vmware.com>
To: Sami Boutros <sboutros@vmware.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/EIYCNthIKxmIhOySHFdRzJVsZ-0>
Subject: Re: [Pals] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 06:33:38 -0000

Hi Sami,
  Thanks for addressing by DISCUSS point and all but one of my COMMENT points. All of your resolutions work for me. I will clear based on that. One open item inline regarding my COMMENT 

> On Nov 13, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Sami Boutros <sboutros@vmware.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> * I think there is a typo in Figure 2.
>> 
>> The "AII Type" field should be labeled "SAII Type" instead
> 
> Sami:
> 
> No, this is correct, attachment individual identifiers AII type 1 or type 2 identifies a SAII or a TAII.

I understand your point but that is not what the figure describes. My request is for the figure to be consistent. If you want to use "AII type" then don’t label the value as "SAII value" as it may be a TAII value based on the AII type. Label it as “AII Value” or lock down the AII type to 2. I am not blocking on this and I leave it up to your discretion if you want to address this. 

Thanks
Suresh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email