Re: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon
zhouguangtao <zhouguangtao@chinaunicom.cn> Mon, 16 March 2015 04:49 UTC
Return-Path: <zhouguangtao@chinaunicom.cn>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A721A00A8 for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.907
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, CN_BODY_103=0.327, CN_BODY_35=0.339, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NKOK2pt0a7BC for <pals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sendg.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (sendg.mailex.chinaunicom.cn [210.53.66.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166B91A0089 for <pals@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 0a000f35-f79726d000005de1-fd-550660e382d4
Received: from m10-cen-mlhub04.cnc.intra ( [10.0.192.44]) by sendg.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 74.FA.24033.3E066055; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:49:39 +0800 (HKT)
Received: from m10-hq-mlch01.hq.cnc.intra (10.0.15.26) by m10-cen-mlhub04.cnc.intra (10.0.192.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.213.0; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:49:39 +0800
Received: from GTZhou-PC (114.255.193.227) by m10-hq-mlch01.hq.cnc.intra (10.0.15.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.213.0; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:49:39 +0800
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:49:45 +0800
From: zhouguangtao <zhouguangtao@chinaunicom.cn>
To: Mingui Zhang <zhangmingui@huawei.com>, "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
References: <54F9B9CF.1010207@cisco.com>, <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E76AB538E6@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.91[cn]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2015031612494464813212@chinaunicom.cn>
content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====mte=boundary=number=33710====="
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupkleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42LhYjigo/s4gS3UYPssM4umW++ZLNb8W8dk ce7pHEaLK3Mb2RxYPKb83sjq0XLkLavHkiU/mTy+XP7MFsASVWeTmJeXX5JYkqqQklqcbKsU nJmel1hSWpSq4F9akpRfmpeipJCZYqtkrKRQkJOYnJqbmldiq5RYUJAKlLHjUsAANkBlmXkK qXnJ+SmZeem2SqEhbroWSnZPlzU9mzfnWdOKl1Nmvli//lnf0mdTtiVcYcm4uH4ZW8HiuoqG Hc9ZGhivlncxcnJICJhI3Og5zgZhi0lcuLceyObiEBI4wChx8ttHJghnC6PE5cZNzBDOIkaJ yQ+msoK0sAioSsza8hrMZhMwkHj/dBc7iC0iUCvxtnMt2FhmgVCJVduaWEBsYQE3ifnH1gBN 5QAaVC5xYpIJxGZeiRntT1kgbAGJm1smQF0kJ7H91FqwOK+AoMTJmU+gbGOJLe+PMUGMD5PY d+8MmC0koCGx9NFi5gmMQrOQtMxCUgZha0nMa/gNZStKTOl+yA5ha0pcmXwIytaWWLbwNfMC RrZVjFzBvu4WxhYGun7GmxjByYDfdAfj7YWuhxgFOBiVeHiNXdlChVgTy4orcw8xSnAwK4nw snxjDRXiTUmsrEotyo8vKs1JLT7EaAoMsYnMUqLJ+cBElVcSb2hiZGRmZGhqbmFuYKgkzsvh CTRHIB2YSrJTUwtSi2D6mDg4pRoYbdKa/c9FbrhTInn56lOh9ORVr1ufmE7VeSeoo1y95vaR Zf8tOtXKua83VQS0dvYXX+Zb43vgNVe+/L5Gi5DVJU/P898OUdLNPa/0865mwqxfNS73mxg3 mCy+18kaarPvzcuao3LPC0QFpPwc72nPF3T9lvLE5XI9u7mYwbp3m8s2VM9REbNUYinOSDTU Yi4qTgQAZCNkKRwDAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/o0nJDDcA3mEHik6rAgq4obkTQvM>
Cc: "draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org" <draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:49:49 -0000
如果您错误接收了该邮件,请通过电子邮件立即通知我们。请回复邮件到hqs-spmc@chinaunicom.cn,即可以退订此邮件。我们将立即将您的信息从我们的发送目录中删除。 If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately by e-mail. Please reply to hqs-spmc@chinaunicom.cn if you want to unsubscribe from this mail. We will immediately remove your information from our sending catalogue.
--- Begin Message ---Hi Stewart, We have purchased and constructed ONUs and OLTs separately from multiple vendors. IT is necessary to consider Type-B PON protection and enable their interoperability. Thanks, Guangtao Zhou Senior Engineer Network Technology Research Institute of China Unicom From: Mingui Zhang Date: 2015-03-16 10:40 To: stbryant@cisco.com; pals@ietf.org CC: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon Hi Stewart, If there are practical scenarios for multivendor-PON protection, it would be beneficial to progress it as a new application of ICCP. Since the code-points to be assigned are in the ranges of Expert Review or FCFS in the ICC RG parameter registry, I think it indicates the PALS WG - informational stream is appropriate. Thanks, Mingui >-----Original Message----- >From: Pals [mailto:pals-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant >Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 10:30 PM >To: pals@ietf.org >Cc: draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon@tools.ietf.org >Subject: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon > > >The authors of http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jiang-pwe3-mc-pon/ >have asked us to start a poll for WG adoption. However before we do this >I think that we as a WG need discuss the right way forward for this draft. > >In looking at the history of the draft I discover that there has been almost >no technical discussion on the list. > >If I look back at the minutes I find: > >@ IETF 90 > >YJS: how much is deployed with the 2:n splitters? >Ed: Bright House would probably do it. The splitter would be in house as >it solves other issues. PON is growing, but not a great deal deployed >in NA cable. >Yuanlong: used for small cell backhaul. Can protect a bunch of small >cells. >YJS: so far interest in, but not deployed. 2:N splitter needs to resynch. >Why do we need if phy not there. >Andy: please provide comments to the list. >Matthew: readers? 4, only one commenter on the list > >and @ IETF 91 > >Edwin presented the slides >No comments. >The call for WG adoption will be carried to the email list. >The Chairs noted interest in the meetings and on the list. > >In the last remark we may have been mistaken given that all I >can find are eight emails up to this point excluding automatic notifications >and emails from the authors asking the chairs to take an action. > >In looking at the draft, the only IANA actions are in the ICC RG >parameter registry which has Expert Review or FCFS codepoint >ranges, thus there is no need for a standards track RFC or indeed >any RFC from this point of view. > >In looking at the subject matter itself, I wonder whether this >is a technology where it is expected there will be multi-vendor >deployment within a PON domain requiring multi-vendor >interworking of this feature. > >The IESG have recently been pushing back on the publication of >drafts that have limited support, and thus we need to be in >a position to justify moving forward with this draft on whatever >stream we decide is best. > >Given the above, I would like to understand the views of the >WG on which stream is most appropriate for this work: > >PALS WG - Standards Track > >PALS WG - Informational > >AD sponsored > >Independent Stream > >What are the views of the PALS WG on how we should move forward >and why? > >- Stewart _______________________________________________ Pals mailing list Pals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals 如果您错误接收了该邮件,请通过电子邮件立即通知我们。请回复邮件到hqs-spmc@chinaunicom.cn,即可以退订此邮件。我们将立即将您的信息从我们的发送目录中删除。 If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately by e-mail. Please reply to hqs-spmc@chinaunicom.cn if you want to unsubscribe from this mail. We will immediately remove your information from our sending catalogue.--- End Message ---
- Re: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe… zhouguangtao
- Re: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe… Mingui Zhang
- [Pals] 答复: What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe… Puyun
- Re: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe… weiqiang cheng
- [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe3-mc… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe… Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe… Hongyu Li (Julio)
- Re: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe… Edwin Mallette
- Re: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe… Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [Pals] What should we do with draft-jiang-pwe… shencb