Re: [Pana] pana-ipsec status?
<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Mon, 06 April 2009 15:23 UTC
Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2BC3A6C8F for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.291
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.291 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.308, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7R8nx5q5DyXr for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.105.134]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DEB28C1F1 for <pana@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id n36FO0OV011008; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:24:31 -0500
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 6 Apr 2009 18:24:17 +0300
Received: from vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.22]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 6 Apr 2009 18:24:17 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) by vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 6 Apr 2009 18:24:12 +0300
Received: from NOK-EUMSG-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.108]) by nok-am1mhub-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) with mapi; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:24:12 +0200
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: jari.arkko@piuha.net, pana@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:24:21 +0200
Thread-Topic: [Pana] pana-ipsec status?
Thread-Index: Acm2ueYDslYhPVWNSImTQdqEI2gbZQAEdw3/
Message-ID: <C5FF88D5.26364%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <49DA009B.30507@piuha.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2009 15:24:12.0503 (UTC) FILETIME=[BD29F670:01C9B6CB]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com
Subject: Re: [Pana] pana-ipsec status?
X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access <pana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pana>
List-Post: <mailto:pana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:23:32 -0000
Hi Jari, There is a lack of energy from the original editor of this I-D. We did however get a volunteer (Lionel Morand) to take over the editorship and complete this I-D. If we do not see traction on this I-D in the next few weeks, we can drop it from the WG I-D list and move on. -Raj On 4/6/09 8:16 AM, "ext Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote: > What needs to be done to draft-ietf-pana-ipsec to move it forward? Or > are the serious technical issues based on earlier reviews or lack of > energy? I would like to move forward with the remaining work items... > > Jari > > _______________________________________________ > Pana mailing list > Pana@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
- [Pana] pana-ipsec status? Jari Arkko
- Re: [Pana] pana-ipsec status? Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [Pana] pana-ipsec status? Glen Zorn