IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pana] What to do with I-D: draft-ietf-pana-ipsec

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Thu, 09 April 2009 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9DA3A6AA6 for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.314
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.314 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.285, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ZcYAVBMYgTO for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx03.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAEB03A67E2 for <pana@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id n39J5mtL027539 for <pana@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 22:05:49 +0300
Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.23]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 22:05:49 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) by vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 22:05:44 +0300
Received: from nok-am1mhub-06.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.10) by NOK-AM1MHUB-03.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.340.0; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:05:44 +0200
Received: from NOK-EUMSG-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.108]) by nok-am1mhub-06.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.10]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:05:44 +0200
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: pana@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:05:53 +0200
Thread-Topic: What to do with I-D: draft-ietf-pana-ipsec
Thread-Index: Acm5RjQd3k8ky4ZpMkCBtsGH7Jf/tQ==
Message-ID: <C603B141.26687%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Apr 2009 19:05:44.0879 (UTC) FILETIME=[2F46D3F0:01C9B946]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: [Pana] What to do with I-D: draft-ietf-pana-ipsec
X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access <pana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pana>
List-Post: <mailto:pana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:05:23 -0000

Hello,

The PANA WG developed the concept of securing the link between the host and
the access router (PaC and EP) using IPsec. The I-D: draft-ietf-pana-ipsec
has not been revised since 2005 and I do not see any interest in doing so
either. 
Additionally I believe that the need to use PANA for securing the access
link does not have much traction.

Two questions:
1. Should we drop this I-D from the PANA WG scope
2. If the answer to (1) is no, are there any volunteers who would be willing
to revise the I-D and complete the work.

-Raj

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email