IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pana] What to do with I-D: draft-ietf-pana-ipsec

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Wed, 15 April 2009 02:04 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CCC3A6B9E for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.247, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LhPRl3KnPkDf for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx03.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6496B3A6EEA for <pana@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id n3F25RXg025030; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:05:34 +0300
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:05:35 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:05:34 +0300
Received: from nok-am1mhub-06.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.10) by NOK-AM1MHUB-03.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.340.0; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:05:34 +0200
Received: from NOK-EUMSG-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.108]) by nok-am1mhub-06.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.10]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:05:34 +0200
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: yohba@tari.toshiba.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:05:33 +0200
Thread-Topic: [Pana] What to do with I-D: draft-ietf-pana-ipsec
Thread-Index: Acm9W8lg9mU2qcI4RUut72XhHQz2WwAD+F4Q
Message-ID: <FAAB54171A6C764E969E6B4CB3C2ADD20A44A0AFFD@NOK-EUMSG-03.mgdnok.nokia.com>
References: <C603B141.26687%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com> <007201c9b97b$30c606d0$92521470$@net> <5e2406980904100000t57c951duab69d7c0b7b7277@mail.gmail.com> <49E301EA.10605@piuha.net> <20090414235011.GQ29716@steelhead.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20090414235011.GQ29716@steelhead.localdomain>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Apr 2009 02:05:34.0642 (UTC) FILETIME=[A99C6120:01C9BD6E]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: pana@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pana] What to do with I-D: draft-ietf-pana-ipsec
X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access <pana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pana>
List-Post: <mailto:pana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:04:29 -0000

Hi Yoshi,

Current intent is to complete the WG I-Ds. Given that the PEMK I-D is not a WG document at this time, I would be reluctant to consider any further action from the PANA WG perspective. 

-Raj 

-----Original Message-----
From: pana-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pana-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Yoshihiro Ohba
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:50 PM
To: Jari Arkko
Cc: pana@ietf.org; Patil Basavaraj (Nokia-D/Dallas)
Subject: Re: [Pana] What to do with I-D: draft-ietf-pana-ipsec

There is a related document (i.e., draft-ohba-pana-pemk-02) that defines PaC-EP Master Key (PEMK).  PEMK is derived to be cryptographically independent across multiple different types of lower layers including IPsec.  What should we do with pana-pemk draft?

Yoshihiro Ohba


On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:12:10PM +0300, Jari Arkko wrote:
> My primary issue with this document was the lack of cycles, if there 
> had been no one interested in taking it to completion we should have 
> dropped it. Since you two are volunteering, can you work with the 
> chairs to take over the work, and do whatever is needed to bring the 
> document to a reasonable state?
>
> Jari
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pana mailing list
> Pana@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
>
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email