Re: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta

Cuiyang <cuiyang@huawei.com> Thu, 25 October 2012 02:53 UTC

Return-Path: <cuiyang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: paws@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB7321F8F47 for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZL9F8QhDh7FC for <paws@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B0D21F8F46 for <paws@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AMA74178; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 02:53:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 03:52:58 +0100
Received: from SZXEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.153) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 03:53:08 +0100
Received: from SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.236]) by SZXEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.153]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:53:06 +0800
From: Cuiyang <cuiyang@huawei.com>
To: Nancy Bravin <nbravin@earthlink.net>
Thread-Topic: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta
Thread-Index: Ac2PdDKxV3nQ9+C+QhORZsf33FFydQh8YuFAAA4VxHAAF+b2AAAT6Hcw
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 02:53:05 +0000
Message-ID: <8CC0CB0BCAE52F46882E17828A9AE21636871A7E@SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <1ECAFF543A2FED4EA2BEB6CACE08E47602012484@008-AM1MPN1-007.mgdnok.nokia.com> <1ECAFF543A2FED4EA2BEB6CACE08E4760206EB4E@008-AM1MPN1-007.mgdnok.nokia.com> <8CC0CB0BCAE52F46882E17828A9AE2163687174A@SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com> <A0B3297D-B67F-4C4C-90F2-E99CC76F6EF0@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <A0B3297D-B67F-4C4C-90F2-E99CC76F6EF0@earthlink.net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.48.135]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8CC0CB0BCAE52F46882E17828A9AE21636871A7ESZXEML508MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "paws@ietf.org" <paws@ietf.org>, "br@brianrosen.net" <br@brianrosen.net>
Subject: Re: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta
X-BeenThere: paws@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Protocol to Access White Space database \(PAWS\)" <paws.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/paws>
List-Post: <mailto:paws@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws>, <mailto:paws-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 02:53:57 -0000

Hi Nancy,

Thanks for your kind reminding;-)
I have noticed that a lengthy discussion on the list and at Vancouver on the security issues.
We are not aimed to rewrite the common agreement that WG has got.

The previous version of our draft is focused on the authentication and authorization model, for example, the interaction of master device, database and FCC.
But the latest version simplifies the models, which provides a solution that “How database can validate a FCC approved master device”, etc.
It could naturally solve the ID/device revocation problem.
Also, since PSK auth is left out with a concern that IESG may refuse it without the key provision mechanism, we could try to provide PSK authentication with proper key provision mechanism.

All in all, this submission is to discuss the possible threats and solutions not included in the current WG doc.

Thanks,
Yang
==================
Yang Cui,  Ph.D.
Huawei Technologies
cuiyang@huawei.com

发件人: Nancy Bravin [mailto:nbravin@earthlink.net]
发送时间: 2012年10月25日 7:39
收件人: Cuiyang
抄送: Gabor.Bajko@nokia.com; paws@ietf.org; br@brianrosen.net
主题: Re: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta

Hi Yang,

It seems to me that when advocating issues that have been agreed upon otherwise before, at this late date, will need a formal proposal before
any adoption takes place so the members have time to go through your presentation and again be able to respond via the reflector.
Case in point…certificates/TLS…my recollection is that many discussed this for a long time and it was not excepted in the proposal.
What is the thought process for changing this now and can you elaborate on why each area of change, needed or already decided against
is in your presentation asap so there can be a proper proposal timeframe with members able to give such ideas its due time and questions
on the PAWS reflector starting now, it may be of help to all of us, and in some cases be a help to the total effort.

Thanks,

Nancy
On Oct 23, 2012, at 9:15 PM, Cuiyang wrote:


Hi, Gabor and Brian

We would like to ask for a time slot for introducing our draft-wu-paws-secutity-01.

Thanks,
Yang
==================
Yang Cui,  Ph.D.
Huawei Technologies
cuiyang@huawei.com<mailto:cuiyang@huawei.com>


==================
Yang Cui,  Ph.D.
Huawei Technologies
cuiyang@huawei.com<mailto:cuiyang@huawei.com>

发件人: paws-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:paws-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:paws-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Gabor.Bajko@nokia.com<mailto:Gabor.Bajko@nokia.com>
发送时间: 2012年10月24日 5:32
收件人: paws@ietf.org<mailto:paws@ietf.org>
主题: Re: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta

If you would like a timeslot to present in the upcoming F2F, please send a request to the chairs.
Thanks, Gabor

From: paws-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:paws-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:paws-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bajko Gabor (Nokia-CIC/SiliconValley)
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 9:51 AM
To: paws@ietf.org<mailto:paws@ietf.org>
Subject: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta

Folks,

FYI, I just requested a 2.5 hour session for PAWS at the Atlanta meeting.

-          Gabor

_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
paws@ietf.org<mailto:paws@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws