Re: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta

Hi Yang, 

It seems to me that when advocating issues that have been agreed upon otherwise before, at this late date, will need a formal proposal before
any adoption takes place so the members have time to go through your presentation and again be able to respond via the reflector. 
Case in point…certificates/TLS…my recollection is that many discussed this for a long time and it was not excepted in the proposal. 
What is the thought process for changing this now and can you elaborate on why each area of change, needed or already decided against
is in your presentation asap so there can be a proper proposal timeframe with members able to give such ideas its due time and questions
on the PAWS reflector starting now, it may be of help to all of us, and in some cases be a help to the total effort.

Thanks, 

Nancy
On Oct 23, 2012, at 9:15 PM, Cuiyang wrote:

> Hi, Gabor and Brian
>  
> We would like to ask for a time slot for introducing our draft-wu-paws-secutity-01.
>  
> Thanks,
> Yang
> ==================
> Yang Cui,  Ph.D.
> Huawei Technologies
> cuiyang@huawei.com
>  
>  
> ==================
> Yang Cui,  Ph.D.
> Huawei Technologies
> cuiyang@huawei.com
>  
> 发件人: paws-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:paws-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Gabor.Bajko@nokia.com
> 发送时间: 2012年10月24日 5:32
> 收件人: paws@ietf.org
> 主题: Re: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta
>  
> If you would like a timeslot to present in the upcoming F2F, please send a request to the chairs.
> Thanks, Gabor
>  
> From: paws-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:paws-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bajko Gabor (Nokia-CIC/SiliconValley)
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 9:51 AM
> To: paws@ietf.org
> Subject: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta
>  
> Folks,
>  
> FYI, I just requested a 2.5 hour session for PAWS at the Atlanta meeting.
>  
> -          Gabor
>  
> _______________________________________________
> paws mailing list
> paws@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws